https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12555513/Electric-car-EXPLODES-driveway-sets-fire-Merseyside-family-home-battery-malfunctions.html

'Electric car' EXPLODES on driveway and sets fire to Merseyside family home after 'battery malfunctions'

My city here in the US has encouraged people to get chargers installed in their garages.

Between the cars and their chargers it seems to me like people are allowing devices into their lives that could be remotely detonated or which are just at high risk of dangerous explosions. Sort of like "smart" meters.

>>19610187

That's a fair question I guess. However, what's worse imo are the vaccines given to babies.

If a child dies of SIDS or is rushed to the ER with seizures why don't doctors get investigated and/or prosecuted?

>>19610187

That's a fair question I guess. However, what's worse imo are the vaccines given to babies.

If a child dies of SIDS or is rushed to the ER with seizures why don't doctors get investigated and/or prosecuted?

>>19610187

That's a fair question I guess. However, what's worse imo are the vaccines given to babies.

If a child dies of SIDS or is rushed to the ER with seizures why don't doctors get investigated and/or prosecuted?

>>19610200

> They don't understand the concept of a "god" unless you constantly brain wash them

I don't think this is right. Why do you call it "brain washing"? Children are sometimes very sensitive to spiritual realities.

The parents of a niece of mine thought their daughter had seen angels, I think. She may have been protected by them, too.

One of my children said "Jesus, friend" as one of "their" earliest phrases.

Another of mine prayed for not one but two birds that had crashed into windows. Both, to my surprise flew away.

Children easily believe in God, when they are raised in a home with love. They are "new" from God and still sensitive to His spirit.

Maybe you are familiar with settings that were harsh or dogmatic instead of loving?

>>19610200

> They don't understand the concept of a "god" unless you constantly brain wash them

I don't think this is right. Why do you call it "brain washing"? Children are sometimes very sensitive to spiritual realities.

The parents of a niece of mine thought their daughter had seen angels, I think. She may have been protected by them, too.

One of my children said "Jesus, friend" as one of "their" earliest phrases.

Another of mine prayed for not one but two birds that had crashed into windows. Both, to my surprise flew away.

Children easily believe in God, when they are raised in a home with love. They are "new" from God and still sensitive to His spirit.

Maybe you are familiar with settings that were harsh or dogmatic instead of loving?

>>19610346

>>19610335

This is great work!

I think I can add a little to the deciphering.

The word in the capped images beginning with "e". Could that be "employees"?

This is what I get after "Big P …": "about 80 of them are ready to give their employees birth control (B.C.) information and ask me to help them get started.

Thanks to anon for revisiting the connection between Mary Lasker (woman who basically got NIH into being the medical research behemoth that it is) and Margaret Sanger. I was thinking of getting back into the dig on this subject.

Here's something interesting to consider:

https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/tl/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101584665X191-doc

Pics related (hope they are readable)

You can see how interesting in population control both women appear to be. What really got my attention is from the information at the bottom of the linked archived letter.

Quote: "Lasker became involved in the birth control movementwhose leader was Margaret Sangerafter the 1936 White House Conference on Child Health and Protection alarmed her with its findings of endemic childhood diseases and poverty. In 1938, she became secretary of the Birth Control Federation of America and later of its successor, the Planned Parenthood Federation. She and Albert Lasker were the largest individual donors to birth-control programs in the country in the early 1940s. Other than birth control, Mary Lasker did not involve herself specifically in women's health issues."

NIH is the largest funder of medical research in the world, but the woman who seemingly almost singlehandedly got the NIH to its present status wasn't interested much in women's health beyond birth control!