tyb
any anons got a theory why the jew shit has gotten so bad here lately? anon wonders what the shills are trying to distract from?
>Enough Lag for me today
between the lag and the sudden increase of jew shit, it's kinda like we are being driven away from the board. wonder why that is…
the kiddie steps
it's just so weird that i trust russia more than i trust america and the west nowadays.
Poll: Overwhelming majorities express concerns about Biden, Trump ahead of 2024 race
Trump's lead has expanded in the GOP presidential contest, while Biden and Trump are tied in a hypothetical general election matchup.
The poll also shows Trump expanding his national lead in the Republican presidential nominating contest to more than 40 points over his nearest competition, and it has Biden and Trump deadlocked in a hypothetical rematch more than a year before the general election.
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/poll-overwhelming-majorities-express-concerns-biden-trump-ahead-2024-r-rcna111347
NBC to the rescue!!! kek
JPMorgan Chase settles Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking suit by U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million
JPMorgan Chase said Tuesday it will pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit by the U.S. Virgin Islands alleging that the huge American bank facilitated and benefited from sex trafficking of young women by its longtime customer Jeffrey Epstein.
JPMorgan did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, which will give $55 million to Virgin Islands charities and the American territory's anti-trafficking efforts.
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/09/26/jpmorgan-to-settle-jeffrey-epstein-suit-by-virgin-islands.html
damn, that was quick. wonder why…
JPMorgan Chase settles Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking suit by U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million
JPMorgan Chase said Tuesday it will pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit by the U.S. Virgin Islands alleging that the huge American bank facilitated and benefited from sex trafficking of young women by its longtime customer Jeffrey Epstein.
JPMorgan did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, which will give $55 million to Virgin Islands charities and the American territory's anti-trafficking efforts.
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/09/26/jpmorgan-to-settle-jeffrey-epstein-suit-by-virgin-islands.html
damn, that was quick. wonder why…
JPMorgan Chase settles Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking suit by U.S. Virgin Islands for $75 million
JPMorgan Chase said Tuesday it will pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit by the U.S. Virgin Islands alleging that the huge American bank facilitated and benefited from sex trafficking of young women by its longtime customer Jeffrey Epstein.
JPMorgan did not admit any wrongdoing in the settlement, which will give $55 million to Virgin Islands charities and the American territory's anti-trafficking efforts.
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/09/26/jpmorgan-to-settle-jeffrey-epstein-suit-by-virgin-islands.html
damn, that was quick. wonder why…
not your fault. it's the board being freaky.
unrelated pic still attached from an earlier post. so freaky
>California Gov. Newsom signs law raising taxes on gun and ammunition sales to pay for school safety, violence prevention - AP
yep, he definitely running.
EDITORIAL: Never Never Land for California regulators
It’s shocking, but California’s efforts to force-feed electric vehicles to its residents and businesses has already hit a few snags. Perhaps the state’s regulatory-happy politicians need to put the brakes on virtue signaling and return to reality.
Starting Jan. 1, all new trucks purchased that serve California ports must be zero-emission vehicles. Under current law, it will be illegal by 2035 to operate gasoline-powered trucks in the state.Whether this is at all practical for the transport of consumer goods is of little concern to leftists merrily running the Golden State into the ground.
Shipping companies note that electric trucks cost three times more than their diesel counterparts and that finding charging stations remains a challenge. Many of the newfangled trucks can go only a few hundred miles on a charge, the Wall Street Journal reports, “so they can run only short trips between ports and nearby rail yards and warehouses.” In addition, production of trucks that satisfy the mandate is limited while repair costs are exorbitant and reliability is a concern.
All of this will make California ports less competitive and less efficient while threatening vital supply chains and driving up costs for shipping companies and consumers. It will also do nothing to address global warming.
What it has done, however, is create a run on gasoline-powered diesel trucks.
“I have to think every trucker in California,” Kenny Vieth, president of ACT research, told the Journal, “is doing all they can to get as many pre-mandate trucks in place as they possibly can.”
In other words, trucking firms now have a clear incentive to buy more diesel trucks before the January deadline. Indeed, one shipping firm owner told the Journal that he had recently bought 20 new diesel trucks for his fleet. “We are trying to take the hit now at a lot more reasonable cost per month versus buying electric vehicles next year,” he said.
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reviewjournal.com%2Fopinion%2Feditorials%2Feditorial-never-never-land-for-california-regulators-2910259%2F
remember Q saying something about the port of long beach. this will have massive impact for the country. what happens in CA effects every state.