RE: FIFTH AVE. ANON

Point of order!

Q NEVER gave a thumbs up on this Anon!

This Anon hijacked the original 666 Building thread and made their own ^ building thread where only they posted.

The 3rd bread of research had a notation at the top labeled Mandatory Reading which led to a paytriot site, neonrevolt.

That site does request donations for their work.

Additionally, another youtuber was taking neons info and making vids from it and again, asking for donations.

As I recall, the youtube vids did NOT lead in the correct direction.

BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW

Q NEVER officially approved this Anon as the 'official' BV of the 666 Fifth Ave research!

>>1961920

Now that the thread has been archived, the 'mandatory reading' contained in the original formatting is no longer there.

But I can tell you with great confidence that it was there. I spent 2 months in that research and am very familiar with the events as they unfolded.

There also exists a notation in that thread of Q not validating this Anon as THE BV of the research and to tread carefully until Q 'approved'. THAT never happened.

WE ARE ALL ANON

This Fifth Ave. Anon seems to get an awful lot of attention even tho Q never confirmed them.

>>1961920

>>1962006

>>1961882

RE: Fifth Ave Anon

Here's a post from that thread that points to the fukery that was taking place in the research.

>>1364284

IMPORTANT!

It has been revealed that 5th Ave Anon was an 'agent' and was misdirecting our research here. Personally, I saw our direction of research being hijacked on a daily basis.

That Anon shared our info with a site called unirock who then made numerous youtubes about our research and made money from those vids. This reveal can be seen in general # >>1363033.

It has been suggested that these Anons directed research in an attempt to post info that could damage the reputation of our research!

Going forward, anything re:5th Ave Anon should be scrutinized!

>>1961920

>>1962072

YES!

And the bread you refer to is the bread that the 5Anon wanted to make 'sticky'; a thread that they had created AWAY fro the main research bread.

https://8ch.net/comms/res/679.html#680

^THAT IS NOT one of the 3 original breads in the official research but a 'solo' bread!!!>>1962072

>>1962112

Glowing? (You) with 14 posts in this bread alone?

This research and that bread was a solo endeavor.

It was done outside of the main research bread!

Going solo defies WWG1WGA

Not fooling me.

Going out on a limb…

I often wondered of Fifth Ave. Anon was Beanz.

j/s

And why does the red Notable not include a link?

And NO. It is NOT confirmation of anything Fifth Ave Anon may or may not have done because WWG1WGA.

Anon was not a super-hero or the only researcher.

Shameless self-promotion, imo.