I think = Mar-a-lago is the only one on the list besides #1 Buckingham Palace at $4.9 billion that has "any formal military bunker capabilities" and therefor should be assess closer to number 1 than all the rest. So when you couple that with knowing the future "Trump Branding" == would increase it's valuation exponentially as part of our society let alone our history due his Presidency; we are left with a value proposition equal too or beyond that of Buckingham Palace.
>I think Mar-a-lago is the only one on the list besides #1 Buckingham Palace at $4.9 billion that has "any formal military bunker capabilities" and therefor should be assess closer to number 1 than all the rest. So when you couple that with knowing the future "Trump Branding" would increase it's valuation exponentially as part of our society let alone our history due his Presidency; we are left with a value proposition equal too or beyond that of Buckingham Palace. ==
I think Mar-a-lago is the only one on the list besides #1 Buckingham Palace at $4.9 billion that has "any formal military bunker capabilities" and therefor should be assess closer to number 1 than all the rest. So when you couple that with knowing the future "Trump Branding" would increase it's valuation exponentially as part of our society let alone our history due his Presidency; we are left with a value proposition equal too or beyond that of Buckingham Palace
Notable
>I think Mar-a-lago is the only one on the list besides #1 Buckingham Palace at $4.9 billion that has "any formal military bunker capabilities"