>>1962164
THANQ Anon!
I agree!
Having that Anon- in RED- in the Notables namefagging/self-promoting is against EVERYTHING WWG1WGA stands for.
And NEVER approved by Q!
>>1962164
THANQ Anon!
I agree!
Having that Anon- in RED- in the Notables namefagging/self-promoting is against EVERYTHING WWG1WGA stands for.
And NEVER approved by Q!
BAKER
PLEASE remove the namefagging in the Notables!
This "Fifth Ave Anon" is self-promoting!
As if three sixes appearing puts a gold star next to their name?
There have been numerous issues with the research and it being hijacked in the early days of research in that thread. There were 3 official breads and one 'solo' bread that only that Anon posted in.
NOT WWG1WGA action!
PLEASE remove this 'Notable'!
namefags need not apply!
ThanQ for addressing it.
I do have to say that having it in RED in Notables is glowing as a namefag, doncha think?
There's also been talk of that Anon being one Tracy Beanz.
If so, even more reason to edit! j/s
Was never endorsed by Q.
Went solo with the research by creating own bread away from the main 3 breads.
Counter to the WWG1WGA - especially self-promoting in the NOTABLES!