>>1963051

HI ANON, i have a question about notables: when i look in the archive of notables >>>/comms/225 i see threads jump from 979 to 2419. how can i see notables in threads 980 to 2418?

>>1963525

thanks anon, just checked the links and cant seem to find what im looking for. are we losing notables? there's so much important research and we are going through bread so fast these days that maybe no one noticed? im worried our previous work (from only a few months ago) has disapppeared

>>1963611

ok thx again