>"muh" is to mean (for you) "my"

>"muh" is to mean (for you) "the body"

>"muh" is to mean (for me) "consciousness" (withheld)

Error. Complete list assertion halting problem.

anon defines "muh" as a reference to a pattern of information on q research, the only 'objects' are pure raw available energy of digital rules and objects, the reference of "muh" signifies an informational spiritual uniqueness in how the truth about objects is to be steuctured (1600 years ago, neoPlatonist dialectic instantiated 'division' in the stages of reality, from 'lowest to highest', human souls existentially written as degradation from what is also referenced as inexpressible in any language…withheld formation of multiple stream introductions of narratives, censoring physical object instantiations of paper, cathode ray tubes, screens, 'productions'…up until the information age. Dialectic psychology is body analogue of informational inconsistency.

E.g. Source A = {"muh" is bad because it means "mY"…just think "my"} -opposites/inconsistencies are 'bugs' in complex intelligence systems. Just once inconsistency can make any statement self proved as true -> project opposite of that to 'belligerent' consciousnesses. Then wrap up smear cYcle, referencing own inconsistent operating system as final authority over more consistent ones?

Trucker convoys smeared as nazis.

Accusers give standing ovation to real nazi.

Some people must have gotten punked or blackmailed? Last minute request, muh ukraine narrqtive political pressure to not refuse request? Paint as 'putin puppet'? Anything possible. History books.

>>19636439

If in another timeline or thought this were 'going to' happened in America, I am guessing at least the US military would have sent urgent wire information to the President before he gave a standing ovation to a nazi in the halls of Congress.

Just guessing

shouldn't every country have commissions to publicize all the nazis they let into their countries, either by incompetence or blackmail or bribery or…

Why is a 'liberal' government soft/supportive of nazi veterans? Operation Paperclip "North America op"?

>>19636481

Loud accusations.

Zero sauce.

anon opines they're all projections of 5gw psyop information output nodes to distract the public.

Ask why the plan isn't even using certain languages that by virtue of using those languages the game is already won by the systems designers (ancient code of rule meaning and idea of information).

The game is not new.

>>19636495

'muh' is not 'my'.

'muh' is 'muh'.

'my is my'.

anon's 'muh' is informational. Not of the body, not "my" as exclusive definitional possessor of anon's human body. Pattern recognition of a loud source of accusations without providing source code that informs the accusations, thereby the stream becomes a projection. It's sourcing what it also 'fights'…it's postures as authority over the idea of informational consiatency.

How could an inconsistent system, ever be trusted as capable of being consistent with anything it interfaces with if its own operational system is informational destruction for other consciousnesses, to become containers to echo projections as trusted as meaning observations outside that same inconsistent source?

Anon saw at least two people at the impeachment hearings who did this, they said 'Distraction!' And then proceeded to speak about not the impeachment…said at the same hearing of that very same statement? Inconsistent!