>>19635828 (pb)
In answer to the question "Does this mean I can still get COVID?" I think there is a legitimate question about the existence of the "virus" reported to cause "COVID". However, irrespective of that, my answer would be "yes" and it would not depend on whether or not a person received the placebo or not.
This question as presented in the NOTABLE, hints at the true state of "vaccine science" in my view. My deep dig on vaccines (all, not just the "COVID" injections) started in 2016 when the movie "Vaxxed" came out. Vaccine clinical trials are, nearly without exception, garbage, in my view. The "placebos" used often consist of another vaccine or the entire concoction minus the major antigen used. The test subjects are often followed only very briefly after getting the injections (sometimes only days) and often, under the assumption the vaccine is 'safe and effective' the control group is vaccinated
with the study vaccine, effectively eliminating the control group. In addition, some studies have been subject to midstream changes in protocol such as the CDC study at the center of the "Vaxxed" movie in which protocol changes and destruction of records (copies were maintained by William Thompson) apparently occurred in order to "hide" cases of autism and other problems temporally related to MMR vaccination. Also, the case of the mumps portion of the MMR which, I think, still has a whistleblower lawsuit against it alleging that animal antibodies were added to samples in order to create the appearance of effectiveness, suggests that outright experimental fraud has happened.
This means to me that: 1. Few if any vaccine "studies" tell us anything helpful. 2. The suggestion of a real "placebo control" trial for any COVID injection is likely "fake news". 3. No one should rely on a self-reported "clinical trial" by a pharmaceutical company to determine if the vaccine they "tested" will prevent an illness.