dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

It hasn't been used in 150 years, but is designed by the founding fathers specifically to protect the country from the FBI and DOJ breaking the law / not upholding the law / 2 tier system of justice situations.

Interesting b/c

>q post on shutdown

>10 days of darkness

>possible shutdown on Oct 1

>Kash Patel citing this law today

Sergeant at Arms | house.gov

As an elected officer of the House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer of the House of Representatives and is responsible for maintaining order in the House side of the United States Capitol complex.

https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/officers-and-organizations/sergeant-at-arms

>>19638777

>>19638838

Nice. TY

Cucks will cuck

probably

>>19638988

Here's the PDF baker, if you want it to go with this - >>19638838

>>19638731, >>19638831 Kash Patel - The House Could Use A 150 Year Old Law To Arrest People,Will The Obama’s Take The Bait?

>>19639026

>>19639040

.gov pdf explaining the law below, and how it could be used very soon -

Criminal Contempt of Congress: Frequently

Asked Questions

June 5, 2023

The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability (Committee) has been engaged in an oversight

dispute with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over an agency document that reportedly contains

information regarding “an alleged criminal scheme involving then Vice President Biden.” The

Committee’s original subpoena, issued on May 3, 2023, demanded the production of any FBI form FD-

1023—a form used to “record unverified reporting from a confidential human source”—containing the

term “Biden.” The Committee shortly thereafter narrowed the subpoena by adding additional terms to

limit the number of responsive documents. The amended subpoena contained a return date of May 30.

In response, the FBI briefed the Committee and expressed a willingness to pursue an “optimal

accommodation,” but it did not provide the Committee with documents responsive to the subpoena. The

FBI outlined its position in a May 10 letter to the Committee, asserting that

It is critical to the integrity of the entire criminal justice process and to the fulfillment of our law

enforcement duties that FBI avoid revealing information—including unverified or incomplete

information—that could harm investigations, prejudice prosecutions or judicial proceedings,

unfairly violate privacy or reputational interests, or create misimpressions in the public.

The letter concluded by offering to “discuss whether and how we can accommodate your request without

violating our law enforcement and national security obligations.”

On May 30, the FBI informed the Committee that it would not provide the Committee with the

subpoenaed document but would allow Chairman James Comer and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin to

view the document in a secure facility. Chairman Comer and Representative Raskin will reportedly view

the document and receive additional contextual information through a briefing on June 5, but Chairman

Comer has reiterated that “if the FBI fails to hand over the FD-1023 form as required by the subpoena, the

House Oversight Committee will begin contempt of Congress proceedings” against FBI Director

Christopher Wray.

The context of this dispute suggests that Chairman Comer is likely considering a citation for criminal

contempt of Congress—a criminal offense outlined in federal law for noncompliance with a congressional

subpoena. This Sidebar answers a number of frequently asked questions about criminal contempt of Congress.

>>19639059

>>19639079

>>19639026

“if the FBI fails to hand over the FD-1023 form as required by the subpoena, the House Oversight Committee will begin contempt of Congress proceedings” against FBI Director

Christopher Wray.

>Re Wray not handing over docs on Hunter Biden