>>19644255

Kek. That's just it, Anon. Your "sauce" was never once mentioned when I was taught about the Holocaust in the 80s, when Jewish scholars knew that the 6 million was inaccurate. I never once disputed the 6 million. I said the numbers were false, by the placards at Auschwitz, itself. If the numbers at Auschwitz were incorrect, then it means that there was never 6 million. It's a fallacy. Even if your sauce was truly accurate, it doesn't explain why the original placard at Auschwitz said 4 million and 40 years later, when Jewish scholars knew the truth, they still allowed people to believe a lie. I'll tag my own poast for people to read, on their own, but I give you props for trying to distort my comments.

>>19644203 (lb)

>>19644303

Kek. I really hope that faggot who recently called out Pence for being a fudge packer really has the sauce. That will be a top fucking kek.

>>19644322

Okay, Anon. Let's try an easier one, 'cos the who concept of morality seems lost on you, that you can't seem to grasp that an entire group of people [knowingly] fed a lie to every other person that wasn't a part of their group, for their own personal gain.

Simon Wisenthal, famed "Nazi Hunter" who could find Nazis hiding out in remote villages in the mountains of Argentina couldn't find any of the Nazis we brought over here during Operation Paperclip, when they were hiding in plain sight?

>>19644357

> accusations against me

>>19644368

Look, I get it. You're okay with an entire group of people lying about an atrocity which happened to them, so they can dupe the entire world into giving them billions of currency when they were knowingly lying from the start. But don't you dare attempt to investigate it. See, all you're focused on is 6 million. I want to know why they put up a sign that said one thing and when they discovered the truth, rather than be honest, they continued to tell the lie, until they were called out on it. Then, it was "just them," it involved others, but that was another lie they kept hidden.

But you go ahead and focus on the 6 million and all the different ways they try and obfuscate their deceptions. I'll keep searching for the truth.

>>19644389

Would.

>>19644394

I never did. That's you projecting.

>>19644410

More and more people are asking me about the Ukrainian Nazis. They get mind fucked when I send them to an article on Greenblatt saying, "Nah, we're cool with them. They're not the real nazis. They don't go after Jews."

I was raised that the Nazis only had one goal: exterminate the Jews and only the Jews, no matter the cost, as were most of them. Puts them in a pickle it does.

>>19644418

Why on earth would you say "It's a lie to say no innocent were murdered." as a rebuttal to this?

>>19644380

We're talking about lying about the deaths at Auschwitz. We're talking about lying about who all died there. We're talking about knowing the truth, but continuing on with the lie, 'cos it benefits Jews, as a collective.

>>19644428

Either way, the fact of the matter is, they were lying about 4 million people dying at Auschwitz and led a good majority of Gen-X to believe that lie, when they knew it was a falsehood. Everyone seems to be focused on the numbers, when I'm focused on the deception. Every knows the Lolocaust numbers are a lie. When are Jews, as a group, going to start taking responsibility for said lies and others, like the masturbation death machines, electrified floors, roller coaster ovens, et al?

>>19644440

So prove me wrong?

>>19644458

>>19644465

What does "it's a lie to say no innocents were killed" have to do with Jewish scholars lying about the number of people who actually died at Auschwitz and keeping it hidden for at least a decade, when it was discovered to be innacurate? I'll give you a hint. It doesn't.