Anonymous ID: 0d949a Oct. 1, 2023, 5:57 p.m. No.19648287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8366 >>8498 >>8605

>>19647501, >>19647511, >>19647515, >>19647518, >>19647543 Anons, what was the mathematical statistical theory that Q posted that had to deal with "coincidences"? PN

 

He taught us there are no coincidences

 

3589

13-Nov-2019 11:15:54 AM EST

8kun/qresearch7354115

 

https://twitter.com/SeekretAgent/status/1194312252104544256

 

What are the odds of that?

Mathematically impossible?

Coincidence?

The TRUTH is right in front of you.

Q

Anonymous ID: 0d949a Oct. 1, 2023, 6:35 p.m. No.19648477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8921 >>9025 >>9060 >>9130

The Supreme Court Could Weigh In On Whether Colleges’ Speech Police Are Legal

Brandon PoulterOctober 01, 2023 2:49 PM ET)

The Supreme Court could weigh in on the constitutionality of so-called bias response teams at colleges in the U.S., which free speech organizations say are used to discriminate against political viewpoints and to chill free speech.

 

Bias response teams are systems created to monitor alleged biased speech on college campuses, which often end up with students reporting other students for politically disfavored speech, according to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). Students are then brought before administrators in what can be a long-drawn-out process that discourages students from speaking their minds and expressing disfavored viewpoints, which free speech advocates argue violates the First Amendment.

 

The Alumni Free Speech Alliance, a group of over a dozen free speech alumni organizations, alleges that bias response teams are used to target individuals and often cause students to self-censor, resulting in less intellectual freedom on campuses. The groups filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of advocate group Speech First, which is suing Virginia Tech over its bias-response team.

 

“In history, it’s always repressive regimes that pick a scapegoat and sometimes not even with aforethought. It just happens they rile up the crowds against them. And that’s what these bias systems are used for,” Chuck Davis, president of the Alumni Free Speech Alliance, told the DCNF.

 

The number of bias response teams at public and private American colleges and universities was 232, according to FIRE. That number nearly doubled to 456 by 2022, according to Free Speech Alliance.

 

“The goal of these teams is censorship,” FIRE Program Officer Zach Greenberg, told the DCNF.

 

“These bias response teams have been used to report on group chats and even by third parties walking by on campus,” Greenberg continued.

 

By policing the expression of bias, these bias response teams are violating the First Amendment, Greenberg explained. Speech which might be perceived as discriminatory or as an expression of bias, such as political speech or offensive jokes, is protected by the First Amendment.

 

For example, Gonzaga University, which has a bias response team, defines a bias incident as “non-criminal conduct, speech, or expression” that is motivated by “prejudice” because of “real or perceived characteristics,” accordingto their website. This then triggers a review of the incident, which may or may not result in an “educational conversation” or referral to another office.

 

“Being investigated is the punishment,” Eric Rasmusen, former economics professor at UCLA and member of the MIT Free Speech Alliance, told the DCNF.

 

At one incident at the University of Northern Colorado, a professor challenged his students to read a controversial book with the intent of discussing difficult topics and discussing why they were difficult to talk about, only to be reported to the bias response team for alleged offensive behavior, according to National Review.

 

“It’s well within the professor’s right to recommend controversial classroom materials,” Greenberg told the DCNF.

 

In the case of Virginia Tech, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals said the bias response team was not unconstitutional since it does not directly punish students. Virginia Tech’s bias response team accepts anonymous tips about other students, and once had a website up which said students could report on things from “jokes that are demeaning to a particular group of people” to “hosting a culturally themed party.”

 

In a separate case regarding Michigan University’s bias response team, Speech First challenged the team’s definitions as being overly broad, according to court documents. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the university’s bias response team was likely to chill speech.

 

Universities sometimes acknowledge that their bias response system may conflict with the freedom of speech.

 

“The expression of an idea or point of view some may find offensive or inflammatory is not necessarily a bias-related incident. While this value of openness protects controversial ideas, it does not protect harassment or expressions of bias,” reads Wake Forest University’s bias response system’s website.

 

“Free speech absolutely protects the expression of bias,” Greenberg told the DCNF.

 

“In the real world, they’ll encounter hateful speech, and students need to be able to handle that,” Greenberg continued.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/01/the-supreme-court-could-weigh-in-on-whether-colleges-speech-police-are-legal/

Anonymous ID: 0d949a Oct. 1, 2023, 6:58 p.m. No.19648592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8610 >>8624 >>8645 >>8921 >>8932 >>9025 >>9060 >>9130

Trump Campaign Trolls Haley With ‘Birdbrain’ Prank Gift

Nicole SilverioOctober 01, 2023

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign sent Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley an empty bird cage over the weekend, apparently as a prank gift in reference to a nickname Trump posted about her on social media.

The Trump campaign confirmed they had sent the cage to Haley by sending a photograph of the cage sitting outside Haley’s hotel room at 1:30 a.m. to The Messenger’s national political reporter, Marc Caputo.

 

Haley posted a photograph of the bird cage with a tag reading, “From: Trump Campaign,” along with a bag of bird food sitting on top of it. Her tweet came two days after Trump called her “Birdbrain.”

 

“After a day of campaigning, this is the message waiting for me outside my hotel room… #PrettyPatheticTryAgain#YouJustMadeMyCaseForMe,” Haley wrote in a Sunday tweet.

 

Trump gave Haley her nickname while taking a swipe at her in a post uploaded Friday to Truth Social. He criticized Haley for previously saying she would not run if Trump entered the 2024 presidential race and said she does not have the “talent or temperament” to be president.

 

“MAGA, or I, will never go for Birdbrain Nikki Haley,” Trump wrote. “No loyalty, plenty of lies! “I will never run against our great President,” she said,”he has done an outstanding job.” To which I responded,”How nice of you to say, Nikki,” knowing full well that her words mean nothing. She even came to Mar-a-Lago with her family, “bearing gifts.” Anyway, Birdbrain doesn’t have the TALENT or TEMPERAMENT to do the job. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” [sic]

 

Caputo said in a tweet that many have accused The Messenger of falling “for a hoax.”

 

“At 1:30 am, the Trump camp texted me the birdcage-and-feed photo in front of Haley’s Des Moines hotel door After I woke up, we posted a story about it @TheMessenger. Now some people are suggesting we fell for a hoax lol Check some of the replies THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE!” Caputo wrote.

 

Social media users cast doubt about Haley’s claim that Trump’s campaign ever sent the cage.

 

“Out of all the things that never happened this never happened the most,” one wrote.

 

“This absolutely did not happen. This is an establishment goober’s idea of what the Trump campaign would do. Probably some overpaid consultant being like ‘this is a great idea!'” Eudaimonia said.

 

“Once again, @NikkiHaley is lying. This time, she had someone buy a bird cage and birdseed and tried to be a fake victim by having it placed outside her hotel room after Donald Trump called her a Bird Brain. But that’s not how any of this works. The Trump campaign would have no idea what room was actually hers at any given hotel. Nobody would,” wrote another Twitter user.

 

“Presidential campaigns never book hotel rooms under the name of the candidate, they book the rooms under the name of someone else for privacy and security. Even the hotel staff wouldn’t actually know what room in the block of rooms was hers,” he continued. “This is all a scam—she thinks you’re stupid. The only part of it that is true is what President Trump originally said: she’s a bird brain.”

 

Haley’s campaign criticized the “weird, creepy, and desperate” incident in a statement to the New York Post.

 

“This behavior is weird, creepy, and desperate from a former president feeling the pressure,” Betsy Ankney, Haley’s campaign manager, said. “It’s more proof that it’s time to leave the drama behind. America is better than this. Let’s go.”

 

Haley currently stands in fourth place with 6.5% support among potential Republican primary voters as of Friday, according to FiveThirtyEight. Trump continues to be the frontrunner of the Republican presidential race with 55% favorability, followed by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy with 13.5% and 6.6%, respectively.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2023/10/01/nikki-haley-trump-campaign-bird-cage-gift-birdbrain/