>>19647501 lb

>>19647511 lb

>>19647515 lb

>>19647518 lb

>>19647543 lb

Seems to me there's no clear line of demarcation between accident / deliberate / meaningful.

People (maybe know or suspect what's going on) but refuse to see it (or refuse to admit they see it; for social reasons- afraid of ostracism, of being called "crazy" or being called "conspiracy theorist" ! (who would care; seems strange - but over decades the powers-that-be have conditioned the public to "see" that way.)

When does something become obvious?

Really good question.

Probably studied professionally in the field of psychology? Study of perception?

Different people will have different thresholds. Calibration on a bullshit detector for more sophisticated feats of recognition?

I believe a mathematician could give a good marking place. "5 deviations" or something? Less. For data sets that can be arranged that way.

Also, when you add the coincidences, it becomes more improbable for them to be unconnected / meaningless.

I studied stats long ago and I remember what you do is MULTIPLY the coincidence factors; So the more there are…it quickly becomes very unlikely that "such a thing would happen" by itself or happen at all, without reason / meaning behind it, of some kind?

When you get a chain of "coincidences" it becomes a pattern. If you connect the dots, a picture will likely emerge.

For instance 9/11, there's a whole chain of improbable "coincidences" - at least in the storyline we are told.

Shills or people who are directed by shills regarding "how to think" and "how to see" will just brush it off as, "These things happen sometimes" since, in their mind, there's nothing stopping a weird series of coincidences from occurring.

They just fail to fathom how incredibly unlikely that all is.

So, "It could happen" is their answer. And unless you can prove it could never happen, they will fail to diverge from the silly story they are told.

There are so many people who fail to understand statistics, but who think they do.

?

>>19647543 pb

Thank you. Just what I was looking for.

kek

>>19649305

I believe a mathematician could give a good marking place. "5 deviations" or something? Less. For data sets that can be arranged that way.

It would be a range, right?

No clear line?

qanon.pub says there's 264 posts which contain the word "Coincidence" in the so-far Q drops.

a sample in the picrel

>>19649309

funny, that would be the cover-up.

kekke

The details they won't share.

alright, that's not a coincidence.

kke

more "coincidence" drops for review.

>>19649323

One of the clocks with Micky show him with a dick?

Haven't seen that one in a while.

Crown owns land Disneyland is on.

"Corona"

"Corona" Queens site of '64 World's Fair, likely owns that land too?

Adolf was a Disney fan and Walt likely a relative.

Makes sense for pedos to run an amusement park for children.

Adolf was a pedo; so is Biden and Hunter.

let's see. what else?

to paraphrase "Q"

something like?

~Children will be the point of Unification for the people of the World

?

That's the gist. Can't remember the exact phrase.

The Mass Media is holding on by a thread.

Push the info-they're soft, it's about to give way. Just push meow.

"Be Loud"

it's some rumor that a gggg-uncle fought at Cowpens. What did they do at the very last? They rushed 'em. It looked bad but they pushed on hard, fast, all at once.

Do it. Push, Loud.

kek