Anonymous ID: 6aeaff Oct. 1, 2023, 9:19 p.m. No.19649279   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9295

>>19649267

>Now, you trannies think nothing of renoting it in 5 consecutive breads.

i actually never saw the harm in reposting it in several consecutive breads, if it was actually notable

the more eyes, the better, n'est ce pas?

Anonymous ID: 6aeaff Oct. 1, 2023, 9:29 p.m. No.19649306   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9322

>>19649295

>That suggests anons are gormless simpletons incapable of perusing past breads.

you ASSume everyone lurking here is a seasoned anon?

what about newfags?

furthermore, you FAILED to state what the actual harm is

methinks YOU are the distractionshill, here to stir the shit storm and create a slide

you're off to a good start