Anonymous ID: 7d1eb3 June 29, 2018, 8:29 p.m. No.1965913   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Haven't been over to Vox Day's site in a while. Imagine my pleasant surprise learning that he also follows Q!

 

http://voxday.blogspot.com

Anonymous ID: 7d1eb3 June 29, 2018, 8:39 p.m. No.1966012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6195

>>1965920

 

I thought that was nonsense untl a certain Soros-funded leftist I happened to be acquainted with started shilling heavily against anyone who would post Halbeg's research or ask questions on FB.

Anonymous ID: 7d1eb3 June 29, 2018, 8:50 p.m. No.1966158   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1965787

>Men shoving their penis into another man's rectum and feces is disgusting.

 

Yep.

 

Great article on that:

 

http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/Culture/disgusting.html

 

>Let us consider what is in people's minds when the subject of homosexuality is brought to their attention. I am not talking about the faculty of Harvard University; I am talking about people, including even people who never went to law school (yes! there are such people!) What is in their minds when homosexuality is mentioned? Buggery, that's what.

 

>I was a bit disconcerted to find, when trying some of these themes out in conversation, that this word is almost unknown in the U.S.A. A colleague brought to my attention the following exchange on Booknotes back in 1991 when Brian Lamb was interviewing Martin Gilbert about his biography of Churchill (it seems you can't avoid Churchill in this area):

 

>Gilbert: … When Churchill was 20 and a young soldier, he was accused of buggery, and you know that's a terrible accusation. Well, he ended up prime minister for quite a long time.

 

>Lamb: Why was he accused of buggery, and what it is?

 

>Gilbert: You don't know what buggery is?

 

>Lamb: Define it, please.

 

>Gilbert [clearly flustered]: Oh, dear. Sorry, I thought the word would … buggery is what used to be called "an unnatural act of the Oscar Wilde type," … is how it was actually phrased in the euphemism of the British papers. You don't know what buggery is? It's a very nasty thing which men can do to each other.

 

>This strikes me as one of the more severe deficiencies of U.S. English. How do Americans cope without a verb for this action? And what do they make of Rossini's description of his mules: "bestie buggierone"? One of my earliest memories from an English childhood is of being goaded by my (older) sister to say "I chased a bug around a tree" without it coming out "dirty." Well, so far as definitions are concerned, I think Martin Gilbert provided the necessary clarification. That is buggery; and that, according to me, is the first thing that comes to people's minds when you raise the topic of homosexuality. Not equal rights for an oppressed minority; not the gruesome death of the unfortunate Mathew Shepard; not Ellen DeGeneres "coming out" on prime-time TV; not Tom Hanks fading away photogenically in Philadelphia. Buggery. Like it or not — and I can quite understand that many homosexuals do not like it at all — buggery is, in the minds of the straight population, the defining act of the "homosexual lifestyle."

Anonymous ID: 7d1eb3 June 29, 2018, 8:53 p.m. No.1966190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1965621

 

Yeah, I noticed that someone I used to know who complained a lot about 'satanic panic' seemed to have a series of girlfriends for short periods of time with young children. Furthermore I think he might be even involved in the human trafficking. In any event, when the raids come, if I see his name I won't be very surprised.