TY note taker
E6s recently flying call signs/squawks:
APRIL11/4627 (is the date significant? or just 411?)
SOSO07/5771 (EAM/FDM mp4 attached sauce: eam.watch)
SQUAB16/2455
https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=ae040e,ae040d,ae0412
>the faggot posts a child in a bikini, intentionally to piss off anons
as an anon said
>>19654499 last bread
>a thousand cuts
>(D)
anon maybe not as ashamed as some would say that anon should be to say anon relieved was not (R)
>>19655319
Description
www.paypal.me/xxxxxxxxxxx
My channel focuses on Astrological happenings, some card readings here and there + anything in regards to FUN stuff happening in the sky. I'll also share my philosophy on any UNIVERSAL topics that may need a touch of reality. Our world is EVOLVING and a NEW AGE WORLD ORDER is birthing right in front of our eyes, so it's an exciting time to be able to share my visions with anyone who aligns with my ideologies and energy. You can follow me on all social media platforms - @xxxxxx
Why didn't PF see this B-52 earlier? Prolly because it is ADS-B spoofing and glitching in and out big time. kek
Up from Barksdale AFB and holding station over southern Louisiana is USAF B-52 Stratofortress 61-0002. Nose art: "Eagles Wrath III".
Call sign SHINR40. RC-135V Rivet Joint has also been in the area. Which is interesting and somewhat unusual. Based on previous observations.
>What is a thought experiment exactly?
A thought experiment is a logical argument or mental model cast within the context of an imaginary (hypothetical or even counterfactual) scenario. A scientific thought experiment, in particular, may examine the implications of a theory, law, or set of principles with the aid of fictive and/or natural particulars (demons sorting molecules, cats whose lives hinge upon a radioactive disintegration, men in enclosed elevators) in an idealized environment (massless trapdoors, absence of friction). They describe experiments that, except for some specific and necessary idealizations, could conceivably be performed in the real world.[2]
As opposed to physical experiments, thought experiments do not report new empirical data. They can only provide conclusions based on deductive or inductive reasoning from their starting assumptions. Thought experiments invoke particulars that are irrelevant to the generality of their conclusions. It is the invocation of these particulars that give thought experiments their experiment-like appearance. A thought experiment can always be reconstructed as a straightforward argument, without the irrelevant particulars. John D. Norton, a well-known philosopher of science, has noted that "a good thought experiment is a good argument; a bad thought experiment is a bad argument.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein's_thought_experiments