>>19664979 lb
>>19665060 lb
"Jury of Peers" is redundant, if "Peers" mean jurymen.
There's two meanings
at least, two.
"Sometimes words have two meanings"
i'll go ahead an get the screen shot of the old dictionary entry.
in case people are curious about sauce, this would be called "Primary"
It's its own sauce.
Actual book hundreds of years old, almost 300.
Photo of page.. counts as primary source.
Draw your own conclusions, but professional historians are supposed to use primary sources. That;s why anons here use documents (other than mass media news)
and "Follow the Pen" of Herridge was reccomended by "Q" team?
Herridge uses Primary sources.
PEERS are gonna Peer.
They shouldn't be blinded by the exclusion of relevant data / info.
Remember Mueller and his ilk, Andrew Weissman, Rod Rosenstein, and Judge Sullivan are known (via informant on record) for their scheme to exclude exculpatory information from the jury"men".
Which they, on the record, have done numerous times.
The Jury brings judgment; if the info shown to them is abridged, the result will be flawed.
But that, of course, is what the crooks desire.
The Peers who peer into the evidence should be the bulwark of Justice- in the same manner as the PIER in the water/ocean/ lake/ river is Pillars to steady a boat.
The SHIP of State, of Justice and Fairness, should be steadied by the Pillar of PEERS - who look into the uncensored, expunged full data / evidence.
Otherwise, Ship of Fools will sink.
They keep on turning in the evidence against themselves, in full view.
kek
Peers of Parliament are the Pillars for the rule of the State; the bulwark against chaos. The post where the Ship of State is tied, in case of Storm.