Anonymous ID: 1cde62 June 29, 2018, 10:25 p.m. No.1967146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7161

>>1967103

Intriguing.

Can Q's drop be reconciled with illegals being invaders within the context of the ultimate question?

The press pool would never come to asking if the immigration issue could ever be considered an illegal invasion and as such would never be prompted to ask.

Anonymous ID: 1cde62 June 29, 2018, 10:29 p.m. No.1967184   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7219

>>1967115

Interesting.

It is possible.

Q has stated "all for a larp" on more than one occasion.

However, considering the agenda of the press pool and what Q represents. Could the press pool be manipulated into asking if Q were real by having POTUS mention Q in some official form? Thus 'forcing it."

Anonymous ID: 1cde62 June 29, 2018, 10:33 p.m. No.1967229   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1967166

Fascinating.

Having never read or possibly watched the material in which you reference, i am not familiar. However, the theory you postulate does have merit.

Anonymous ID: 1cde62 June 29, 2018, 10:45 p.m. No.1967339   🗄️.is 🔗kun

it would be useful if we could be provided with a narrowing context of the ultimate question.

There are several possibilities.