>>19679396 pb President Trump NYC Attorney Alina Habba Gives Great Breakdown of NYC Trial Status

Notable

PDJT is not the consumer: DA sues on behalf of "insurers and banks" as consumers, in fraud case, and their past judgments is proof of it.

Team Trump:

The whole basis of NYS 63-12 is to sue on behalf of "The People of NY", which is the consumer "not" PDJT. The DA is applying "The People of NY" to mean "The insurers and bankers", they are the consumers that the DA is suing on behalf of and the DA is given broad powers by the NYS to protect the consumers interest, which the judge already made a judgement stating that Trump repeatedly defrauded the "insurers and bankers", so they are trapped in their intent.

Make a motion to dismiss on this, because if you call Trump the consumer, then the appellate court will tell you that the DA has the right to protect all consumers including Mr. Trump; it won't work. If the insurers and banks are the consumers then as private enterprises they cannot be "The people of NYS" which is the entire premise of opening and trying a case.

Secondly, you can also dismiss based upon the violation of the 6th Amendment because Trump is entitled to a jury without delay. So not only did they

a: not give him a jury

b: delayed in doing so and even passed judgement with one

c: never named his accusers either

d: The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2 establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. So they cannot get away with a, b, and c because that violates the Supremacy clause and therefor you can dismiss based upon ta, b, c, and/or d.

If the courts past judgment was that Trump defrauded the "insurers and banks" then that is proof positive that the Judge and DA are using them to mean the consumer that they are suing on behalf of as "The people of NYS" which they are not.