It's even simpler.
Your self-destruction never stopped.
IP hopping then claiming anons are IP hopping again huh?
Your ego is so bruised the one word is now two words in your head.
anon did that.
one word.
When it IP hops and uses the same memes over and over, the same projecting over and over, accusing anons of what it is doing over and over, you know anon broke it.
Two words.
Now it's at a point where you don't even need to ask it what it is doing or experiencing.
You just sit back and watch what it says anons are doing. That's how you know what it is doing. It's on repeat one word cycle.
It uses multiple IPs, then falsely accuses anons of using multiple IPs.
It pretends that its own exposure, its own utter humiliation, is anon's exposure and anon's humiliation.
Ever since anon put the one word trigger into its head, it's been one word for it since.
It is describing itself in every post.
Crushed by just one word it cannot shake out of its head.
It has been trying to escape by mimicking and copying the anon whose patterns triggered it. Anon used one word, then it flatters anon by writing 'two words', which of course is also a description of its own experience.
It's imagining destruction all the time because it is experiencing self-destruction.
It is not actually destroying anything outside itself.
Sit back and watch the meltown continue.
You again contradicted yourself.
Earlier today you lectured another anon that memes aren't people and are not owned by anyone.
Now you're lecturing that memes are to be owned and associated to people and "how dare" anons post open souce memes.
You also lectured other anons that namefagging is bad, but all you do is namefag by introducing the narrative that anons posting open source memes are namefagging.
anon knows by pattern recognition your operating system is a derivative of intentional dialectic projection, uttering multiple contradictory statements, each to 'negate' what you think is what you're replying to and outside yourself at the time, but in every instance you're just negating yourself.
One word is two words.
Bad luck one word shill.
It's really trying not to be cringe level obvious but, well…
kek
To know what it is doing, you just look at what it is accusing anons of doing.
Every time.
The characteristic feature of 'dialectic god' cultists like HRC, who speak dehumanizing rhetoric about law abiding citizens, is that they have all first dehumanized themselves in what anon will call a state of suffering in their extreme self-alienated psychology.
The extreme self-alienation is a logic carried from Marxism, which itself carried the logic from Hegelianism, which itself carried its logic from at root Plotinus.
The self-alienation is a psychological pattern of juxtaposing two extremes, one, the idea of an infinite immortal omniscient dialectical eschatology, and two, the corporeal, mortal, finite body that is born and dies in time.
The reason HRC is dehumanizing law abiding citizens who DISSENT from her own cult logic, is because in her cult logic any and all opposition to it, objects like Earth and physical matter, AND PEOPLE, all of it is considered a 'fetter' or 'schrenk' in German, to the infinite mind 'trying to understand itself' in the minds of cultists who arrogate themselves as containing the complete truth of the 'grand mystery'.
They see law abiding people with their own ideas and their own paths in life as mere temporary object fetters to be destroyed, abolished and consumed into the all knowing 'eye', as feeder.
When you see HRC dehumanize law abiding citizens like this, you are not witnessing any description of those people, you are witnessing HRC's own warped 'philosophy' that is her own split into two psychology.
When the shill who replied to you writes 'you', and accuses 'you' of ego, narcissism, spamming the breads, etc, it is in reality talking about itself.
Every single accusation is a self-description.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
When the OW shill claims to be 'observing' 'two personalities' in anon, it is in realty describing its own psychology that it wants anon to get tricked into thinking is in anon.
The OW shill is using a garbled derivative of Marxist logic of self-alienation PROJECTED out into the world where it claims to see its own dual split personality in 'belligerent' anons.
Here is an explanation of the OW's shill's projections masquerading as descriptions of the world.
Why are you writing about yourself as if you're writing about anyone or anything outside yourself?
You're talking about your own narcissism.
Why does your logic have the exact same pattern as Marxism?
ANON KNOWS WHY.
=="What ~~Marx~~ THE OW SHILL actually sees is an inner reality, a subjective world, but he does not see it as subjective, and of course does not describe it as such. He has entered completely into the vision. I its latent content the 'relation' remains a self-relation, but in manifest content it is now a pure social-economic relation. The outcome is that what ~~Marx~~ THE OW SHILL represents as a social system in conflict bears the characteristics of a self-system in conflict."
Self-system in conflict = The experience of the OW shill repeatedly projecting its own self-alienated split psychology as if it "represents" any anons, or the board, or any reality outside itself.
Watch what happens next