Totally not one word in its head.
Why is its narrative identical with Marxist logic?
anon knows.
>Even more ridiculous when an "Anon" gets upset if someone else uses it
That's what you did.
Always one word.
Everything you accuse anons of doing, you're doing.
You never answered why your patterns match Marxist logic.
anon knows why.
Bingo.
The projection shill is accusing anons of ip hopping, that means it is ip hopping.
Look how upset it gets when anons post memes.
It ip hops to inculcate confusion, but its patterns are always noticeable.
bb2dc4
d7884c
The projection shill's logic is identical with Marxism:
"Conflicting forces of the alienated self were conceived as external social forces, and Marx's image of society took final shape as an image of self-become-society. Society, in other words, was envisioned as a self-system whose inner dynamics are those of alienation"
The projection shill's alienated self is presented to anons as external phenomena it is allegedly observing.
Ever since the one word was written on this board to describe a recent pattern of posting, the source of the pattern has been trying every attempt in its book to 'objectify' its own self-alienated psychology to cover up the truth.
All attempts failed. Anon has never stopped viewing everything it writes as an auto-biography of itself.
IP hops / uses multiple devices and seems to believe despite getting exposed already that falsely accusing anons of doing what it is doing that it will hide its unmistakeable dialectical logic patterns that all along identify it like a fingerprint.
"What Marx actually sees is an inner reality, a subjective world, but he does not see it as subjective, and of course does not describe it as such. He has entered completely into the vision."
The projection shill is always describing its own inner psychology and actions, but it does not write it as such, it pretends its own self-alienated psychology is an 'observation' of external phenomena including the truth about anons and what is in fact motivating their behavior.
When it accuses anons posting anonymously of 'larping as baker', it is deceptively projecting its own inner division logic and claiming to 'see' anons using deception.
>Of all the thousands of Pepes they chose to target one specific one. To make it toxic to post so people have a negative emotional reaction and filter on sight. All the effort, all the money, for one picture of a cartoon frog.
You choose 'they', anon chooses 'it', either works.
The reason it attacks this particular pattern of pepe, originally named "psychiatrist pepe", is that the logic of the human mind is a topic that THREATENS it.
For if anons are contemplating psychology, then the projection shill's own psychology will likely become observed as such, as opposed to the 'safer' narrative environment of everyone just thinking everyone else are writing external observations and not talking about their own psychology.
So it goes crazy attacking this frog meme pattern, to do exactly what you wrote, to trick as many eyes as possible into 'just think toxicity when you see this meme', so that anons will self-censor or filter and do what the projection shill wanted all along.
That strategy has also failed.
>>19692954
So is the either/or 'old guard' dialectic incorrect or correct as a full description of all possibilities?
Your meme is internally inconsistent and 'fails' by its own logic. It states dividers will fail, but implements division'.
Look how hard they try. FAIL FAIL FAIL.
Oh so that's what you're doing. It makes even more sense now.
>you really are going out of your mind
>split personality
It keeps describing itself. It really wants its own self-alienation to be objectified.
kek, does it think it's a god? Hahaha
One word.