>>19699967
As convincing as 'antifa'.
>>19700064
All you do is talk about yourself and what you're doing.
Nothing you write is ever a real description of the outside world or of anyone else.
>>19700073
Why don't you filter or scroll past?
You're always talking about your own actions.
>>19700103
You're 'literally' always talking about your own psychology to a "t".
Everything you attribute to your imaginary persona 'smoking pepe', as if it were outside your head, is in fact only yourself.
Why do your patterns match Marxist logic?
Good point.
You keep deflecting from the question by accusing anons of what you're doing.
>>19700156
What a cringe tactic.
Any time multiple anons call it out, it just writes they're all the same anon and deflects from the messages.
That's ALSO a product of its Marxist projection.
>>19700177
All you do is arrogate your low IQ projections as observations.
Everything you post is about yourself.
It's on a broken record loop of projection.
kek.
>>19700230
There's you getting TRIGGERED by that word again. So much so you're now posting it too.
That's two words right there, kek.
anon did that. Why does it trigger you so? It's because it is bullseye over the target.
The one word is forever two words in your head, thanks so anon.
The different anons you're desperately trying to form a consensus as being one anon, know the truth.
Now quick, IP hop again while accusing anons of IP hopping again. You almost have yourself convinced.
>exact same patterns every single time
You mean disagreement, kek.
All the anons who disagree that your projections are truths, are all "proved" to be demonstrating the exact same syntax, grammatical structure, cadence, and sentence structure, so they'll all lumped into one thought object instance, which of course is also your projection of your own Marxist logic.
Yep, it's triggered bigly. The one word it probably wishes it could censor.
When it writes anons are losing their minds, by its demonstrated projection logic that means it is losing its mind.
Still deflecting from this:
All for a cartoon frog.
The pattern appeared in the last few weeks and has been desperately trying to trick people into thinking 'narcissism' when they see psychiatrist pepe meme ever since anon described its pattern with one word.
It likely feels the need to 'destroy' psychiatrist pepe because the pattern is too close and too threatening to what it is knowingly doing, sloppily and error prone.
It repeatedly refuses to even attempt to answer even once. That means it's true. Its patterns are Marxist dialectic logic of projections falsely presented as descriptions of the outside world.
I do not "IP hop"
You're only spamming the breads with Marxist collectivist guilt by association narrative precisely because you're trying to PROTECT AND DEFEND the globalist cult with human shields and a pretext to accuse their 'opponents' of nazis, fascists and anti-semites.
You're not fooling anyone.
He was talking about you, kmao
Positively projecting its own losing of its mind.
"why aren't my projections trusted as truths about anons?" it must be asking itself.
"After criticizing and negating the one word that has triggered me for weeks, maybe if I then unironically start to USE THAT ONE WORD in my own statements, maybe then anons will trust me as something other than a logic bug."
>mentioning
Is that what you call inconsistent flawed group hate and accusations?
"mentioning"?
You're trying to DEFEND the globalist cult by setting up a straw man victim.
Now it's using the one word.
kek