>Q told us NWO is Nazi world order right?
>Could NWO mean AshkeNazi World Order? I think this is right.
No. Re_read crumbs, or stop misleading, whichever applies.
We have not been told by Q exactly what N means, we may be told by Q some day, yet Q has not answered the ?. All we have is speculation for now, in some cases wild speculation.
Are you surprised? We've been warned that it will only get worse. Welcome to worse.
And posts like this are the very reason that Q determined that anons weren't ready. What teacher doesn't test the students? Students aren't ready for major shit, leave it alone and stick to minor shit until they are. Q didn't fail the test, Q gave the test, and overzealous anons failed the test.
Likewise. 39 drops that day made it great, replies made it shitty. Balance, I guess?
Anons are not divided, anons are coming from different backgrounds & in some way we all seek confirmation bias here. We want to be vindicated for what we knew before Q arrived on the scene. Ironically, Q ain't here for that alone. Yeah, (((zionists))) are a major major concern but not the only one.
Board went apeshit, even "argued" with Q (argued in quotes bc it takes 2 to argue)
That too. Almost dared (((them))) to take it down to see what needed to be done to keep the infrastructure up. Protections in place.
Yup, once the attacks are funny to you, you'll be alright.
I didn't complain about the bread. Just stated facts on the attacks. No one is blaming the baker for shills shitting up baker's bread.
Agreed. If I can rephrase: Those who were elected by WE THE PEOPLE (or stole elections from WE THE PEOPLE) & were supposed to represent WE THE PEOPLE in those regards, failed to do so.