>Re: Gowdy – He's not on 'The List'.
Agreed.
Q is clearly trolling the Left in this post.
>Don't jump to conclusions too fast about which list Q is referring to.
FUCK THAT!!
THE CONTEXT & “IN REFERENCE TO” OF THE POST MATTERS!!
@POTUS has publicly released DEFINITIVE list of 25 SCOTUS candidates. THAT is the list Q is referring to!
Gowdy won’t be nominated, so Q’s post is a troll for the Left. Period.
> With Q there is ALWAYS the possibility of double or multiple meanings.
No shit…That mantra slides this board every way to Sunday, which is why Q said to use logic & referenced Occam’s Razor.
Abusing Q’s use of “double-meanings” posts makes everything Q says “relative”, which is bullshit.
The LOGICAL meaning, in context of the re: post, is the SCOTUS list of 25 “prospectives”.
Since POTUS said he would pick from the list of 25, the “add Gowdy?” post is a troll by Q.
Jesus, let Q have some fun, won’t you?!