>It will most likely be someone from this list:
But there is only one woman on that list.
I know they said he would go by the list, but I feel like nominating a woman is the perfect way to undercut the argument over RoevWade and court balance.
>https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trumps-supreme-court-list/
Better list than the other anon posted.
And look who is at the top.
Amy Coney Barrett of Indiana, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
>Attorney General Jeff Sessions' hard-line views on marijuana
I think that is a mischaracterization of his position.
Isn't he just saying change the law?
Similar to immigration, and the complaints over 'zero tolerance', people should ask themselves what percentage of laws (if not 100%) should we enforce?
>why do we even have /need so many laws?
Absolutely agree.
We literally call Congresman 'lawmakers'.
They HAVE to make laws to feel productive.
We should call them 'lawpruners'.
Also, laws help subjugate the populace through fear, since nobody could ever know ALL the laws.
My bet is that he's going after Obama/Brennan and the entire intelligence apparatus, congressional, judicial, and lobbyist collusion that attempted a coup.
If Manafort and/or Page were plants, then it would explain why he's putting the screws on them.
That's why its going to be a woman…