>>19710330 (pb)

sure, but if these new words are needed (they're not) then they shouldn't be called PHOBIAs (IRRATIONAL FEAR), OR, all the old phobias should get new names, since obviously transphobia and islamophobia have NOTHING to do with the word phobia, it's just the lefts usual way of changing the language so that something sounds way worse than what it is, people who are trans-"phobic" are generally disgusted or appalled by or feel sorry for trans people, not afraid of, it could be called anti or it could be called something else, but it isn't PHOBIC

same with islamo-"phobia" most people who are islamo-"PHOBIC" are not afraid of islam, and even if they were, like i said there's nothing irrational with being afraid of a religion that wants you (the unbeliever who doesn't believe mohammed, piss be upon him, was a prophet) dead

i will however concede that homophobia might actually be a real thing, but it's NEVER used in the correct way

>>19710260 (pb)

it is right, islam IS the worst religion on the planet, and it calls for its followers to kill unbelievers, they just don't start doing that at any scale until they are like at least 20-30% of the population

i don't hate muslims, i hate pisslam

personally i believe that probably around half or more of muslims aren't really followers of islam though, they just have a crazy cousin who would kill them if they were honest and said that they don't want to be a part of that shitty religion so they pretend to be muslims so they don't get killed

>>19712750

i believe this to be the case too, though if i'm not misremembering it's either in the quran or the suras that they will kill all jews and that even the trees and stones will speak and say "look a jew is hiding behind me!"

that's pretty fucked up if jews created it themselves to include something like that

>>19712755

religions generally don't evolve, at least not the scriptures (though, to be fair, the quran has been rewritten a lot so maybe they added that later)

and i just gotta say, even though i personally believe that they knew the attack was coming and let it happen for political gain

the possibility of them not knowing in advance is definitely there, they could've just not used phones/computers, just like some mafia guy in italy who evaded the law for like 20+ years living in a cabin somewhere and still ruling, he just personally never used phones, he had lieutenants who he talked to personally and they spread his orders out

>>19712767

yes, i definitely agree with that statement and it is more accurate to who/what i actually believe created islam in the first place are, and then it actually makes sense, they want all out war with everyone and they'll just assume the identity of whoever comes out on top (still doesn't change the fact that islam is the worst religion on the planet)

>>19712782

to be fair (and i agree with you (both?)) what is the difference between "being in a state of awareness or perception", "watching a movie with a happy end" and "living in a simulation" ? aren't those just 3 different ways of saying the same thing?

i suppose that "simulation" implies that the end is open ended (which it isn't) but other than that?

>>19712799

i suppose it's possible, i've never been down there, i just sincerely doubt it, and even then, my first post today and yesterday was "glass the middle east." so, you know, that's my general feeling about this whole thing