>what leader would respect anything he had to say knowing this?
Monogamy is for plebs. Another thing people still haven't figured out, yet.
>what leader would respect anything he had to say knowing this?
Monogamy is for plebs. Another thing people still haven't figured out, yet.
Evil took away your freedoms and dangle them in front of you in pop culture, and convince you to feel "sinful" for wanting them back, and for yourself.
Evil took over your governments, made them into oppressive plantations, and put you in prison for pointing this out.
Evil took possession of everything tangible, then came up with lending institutions to let you borrow it at their leisure, and with interest attached.
Evil took over institutions dedicated to thought and reason, and replaced them with beliefs and division from Truth-seeking systems.
Evil expanded law and restricted freedom so that every possible angle of accusation could be levied against anyone not staying in line.
Evil wants you to pick a side in conflicts that evil perpetuates against humanity. When you do finally relent and pick a side, you are derided for being ignorant, stupid, or worse.
>Many voluntarily hand over their freedoms
Humans, like any other beast, will grow accustomed to limitations imposed when no one else in their peer group can accomplish something to break through the limitations.
Politicians? How about:
-Preachers
-Lawyers/Judges
-Teachers/Professors
-Doctors
-Tax people
-Business people
-Individual states
-Non-profit groups/Churches
-Allies
Keep going, Emerald.
Sure. But if god was so "mad" about that, why did he decide that's how it will end anyway; with the King of Kings on the throne? Rhetorical question, I know. The real question is this:
If this is to be Biblical, and the King is to descend from the "cloud", then who is the unlucky bastard they are going to pick to conclude this mind job?
LOL. They've come across a trap and couldn't help but spring it. In the process of getting stuck in it, they are casting blame.
Water is "people".
Why do you think Jesus is able to "walk on water"? His teachings are meant to elevate those that can hear the message, so they can "walk in faith" above the unlearned. What does this tell you about Revelation's "Beasts"; one being from the sea and the other the earth?
Some people are deceived and will prop up the beast system; governments and religious institutions, before realizing it was all a scheme.
You didn't answer my question, lol.
Will be good info to have so that we can finally understand why PDJT is so insistent on JJ being the next SOTH.
>Returning power to the people IS the King of kings and Lord of Lords taking His seat on His throne.
I agree whole heartedly, but since the modus operadi is "show not tell" because apparently we're in kindergarten, the question asked was:
>then who is the unlucky bastard they are going to pick to conclude this mind job?
All theater aside (because as plans are done by those that are best at it, the outcome is predetermined and known already) what's the plot twist that's going to bring it all together? What's that called, "falling action"?
Because it's a movie, anon.
>Because it's a movie, anon.
And yes, because the hero is almost always a bastard.
No, no, no. You're supposed to say Jesus is always waiting on you, not the other way around. Gah; it's like pulling teeth sometimes.
Weren't Palestinians there before the Roths scribbled up the Balford thing designating land they don't own to people they never belonged to? Does Rubin know this?