Anonymous ID: dd3cf8 Oct. 13, 2023, 5:05 a.m. No.19727723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7754

>>19727683

This is not proof. I think the original may be AI, but I think the dog is also I overlaid the burnt over the dog, there are areads of the burnt like the small circled area on the bottom right. You also have the shape on the left where more fabric was added with the dog as well as the part of the dogs ear and that fold fit what would be a foot perfectly. This looks like a damn good job of inpainting OVER an existing AI image. This helps further complicate what is real and not. Ben is still most likely being deceived but this dog unless it can be sourced where that photo came from needs to be considered sketchy as well also.

Anonymous ID: dd3cf8 Oct. 13, 2023, 5:26 a.m. No.19727799   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19727782

Another question I have is what were they set on fire with, and how long would it take for bones to get to that point even if it is a baby? There could still be real photos of sfx and shit even if not ai. I am not trying to look for an excuse, but knowing people have lied about this shit before, questions should be asked before the emotions get out of whack. SO much can be faked. They could even be real dead babies but how do you confirm where they came from? They could have gotten them from the slave farm, but that can't be there are no slave farms. Well buckle up. All of this is fucking psych war propaganda.