>>1974036

Why would you put a 65 year old on the bench? Think.

>>1974259

Please link to evidence of a single living 120 year old human being.

>>1974306

Unicorns will rule the Eurasia. It will rain Pepsi. Backwards will become tomorrow

>eXpAnD yOuR tHiNkInG!!!!

This fucking board

>>1974353

>>1974328

>>1974318

>>1974312

What the fuck is wrong with you retards? No one over 65 is going to be appointed to the SC. Piro is not going to live to be 120. No one wants a SC judge over 85. Are you faggots brain damaged? JFC.

>>1974480

Boomer retard day here, again.

>muh 120 year old judgez

>>1973961

>>1974450

11.3 - Podesta indicted - THIS FRIDAY?

11.6 - Huma indicted - NEXT MONDAY?

>>1974522

Yeah, sure, or maybe – just maybe – I think the average lifespan in the US is 79 - not 120, and so nominating an older person to the bench is generally not a strategy anyone has every taken? Just spit-ballin' here.

WTF is up with so many retards here today?