Q, is "They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS…we may have to force this one" referring to the interview tomorrow?
Setting up the next narrative. Child separation has run its course, time.to oppose the Supreme Court appointment, regardless of who it is.
Hard to do with thoroughly disgraced party leaders though, especially when they need republicans to vote against the nomination. This is where No Name comes in, media will praise him as a hero for standing up to Trump, in the resistances time of need, despite his "increasingly frail" condition and ongoing treatment.
It's already starting as a matter of fact. McCain was awarded the "LBJ Liberty and Justice for All Award" yesterday. His daughter accepted it, and in the speech said, “[Trump’s] comments are never going to be OK with me, especially at this moment in my life. I’m never going to forgive it. I’m never going to move on from it.”
The media will attack Trump as being a monster for disagreeing with McCain. "Despite the senator’s precarious health, Trump has continued to verbally attack him—namely for giving a deciding “no” vote on the GOP’s effort to overhaul Obamacare."
They know they CANNOT let the nominee's qualifications be the focus of the SC hearings, it must be opposing Trump, and there must be a compelling bipartisan narrative. Q has just told us what it is. Now it's time to dig into No Names past, we need solid evidence to support the criticism of him.