>>1974424

No. I believe we've saturated in the first phase. We will be seeing second phase growth like crazy soon.

Soo many people haven't heard of Q, much less allowed themselves the chance to think about the legitimacy.

See pic.

>>1974521

>>1974509

If we have that question asked prematurely, could it backfire?

Or are we confident that some of Qs recent posts imply that we are ready for it?

>>1974558

>>1974539

Gotta be honest.

That shite doesn't look like a meme. Looks like a piece of art in Tony Podesta's house

>>1974563

kek. I don't have time to stay up-to-date at every moment.

This is me catching up.

Thanks for the response

>>1974595

Gracias!!!

>>1974654

Y'all need a groundswell to take your country back