When the source of a solution to a problem is also a source of the problem.
US taxpayer payijng for it all.
The twitch at the end, kek
Forever.
Still describing yourself.
When you continue making memes that are in truth only referencing one side of your self-alienated psychology, as a means to 'defeat' the other side of your own self-alienated psychology, you're definitely on a self-detonating loop pattern.
When one word is two words in your head, when anon is two words every waking moment of your life, that you demonstrate this fact by 'putting bait out' on an anonymous board, every day, in accordance with the one word being two words, then anon sees those 'baits' for what they really are: Projections of one word being two words.
anon did that.
Wait for it.
Two words, kek
Any time more than anon calls it out, it gets triggered into posting the same syntax, lexicon, and grammatical pattern.
>>19740851
Tell the world more about your own activity and your own experience.
You can do that by continuing in telling anons what you assert anons are doing and thinking.
>>19740871
>ego
We already know that about you, projection shill.
But please keep writing that you 'see' that part of yourself in anons.
You never answered why your patterns match Marxist dialectic.
anon knows why.
One word is two words.
>>19740898
So you're breaking yourself.
Yes, that's already known.
The one word shill continues to take its own bait that are this board and anons being two words. It keeps biting the bait.
Can tell this is the case because it keeps claiming its own psychology is motivating other anons.
So it communicated it wants to perpetuate its own 'board personality' and it is describing its script as an 'anti-board personality' pattern.
It's not looking to 'destroy' 'board personalities', it's looking to make itself the only one. Negating itself each time, begging anons to ingest anything it says as an observation of anons.
Itself 'becoming' a 'board personality' by repeatedly negating its own invoked concept of 'board personality' by 'seeing' itself in anons.
Same pattern as the fake news whining and labelling citizen journalists 'qanon influencer', as a slur.
They're jealous of their own attempt to 'influence'.
For the one word shill, It's not against what it's 'criticizing', it's in fact trying to eliminate it as 'competition' and do it themselves.
How is it doing this?
By prompting 'self-censorship'?
Not a chance.
TL;DR = "I have read what you wrote and I would imagine my own frail and sensitive ego getting bruised if anon didn't read it if I had wrote it, so, I'll say 'TL;DR' and hope that my psychology will be believed as anon's psychology".
(It is after all why it posts here. It wants to experience its own psychology as manifestable in anons)
Two words. Forever.
Kek