This is a few days old:

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/85429/trudeau-regime-puts-canadian-detective-on-trial-for-investigating-link-between-infant-deaths-and.html

TRUDEAU REGIME PUTS CANADIAN DETECTIVE ON TRIAL FOR INVESTIGATING LINK BETWEEN INFANT DEATHS AND MRNA VACCINES

If a dangerous product is intentionally injected into the body of a child or his or her mother while pregnant resulting in death of the infant, then there is likely a criminal case. Why the uproar over this detective? What if ALL sudden infant deaths were investigated as criminal cases and autopsies conducted?

In my city a woman was arrested when an infant died in her care. It seems the child may have been put to sleep incorrectly, and the charges as they appear in the news don't, imo, seem to indicate she intentionally harmed the baby, but was careless or something in putting the child down for a nap. Of course a trial should help clear up what really happened. Why don't those injecting babies with known neurotoxic chemicals face similar scrutiny?

Looking at the "path of totality" in 2024 lead to interest in the New Madrid fault which lead to this:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-021-09869-z

Evaluation of geohazards in the Cape Girardeau area using LiDAR and GIS, Southeast Missouri, USA

I looked up LiDAR. Probably some anons are very familiar with this technology. It seems very interesting and useful. but as I read it occurred to me I no longer regard satellites with lasers as a necessarily benign item.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidar

Anyway, cutting to the chase: Any possibility elaborate mapping of the surface in an earthquake vulnerable region leads to information that someone could use nefariously and remotely?