anon 'certifies' this video as msdnc getting nuked from orbit
https://truthsocial.com/@RealDrJan/posts/111241257096531360
Trump is right: Democrats really are ‘Marxist lunatics’
In some respects, today’s Democrats are more radical than Karl Marx himself was, especially in their antagonism towards the family and their disdain for the value of human life.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/trump-is-right-democrats-really-are-marxist-lunatics/
---—-
anon opine: important read, wow. Must read.
One addition. This statement:
"In some respects, today’s Democrats are more radical than Karl Marx himself was"
Is one of those true but also incompletely true in a known way so still true but needs more.
True, Karl Marx was almost certainly not having in his mind that the dialectic of human events in pre-communist history would 'need' the chemical and surgical mutilation of children as a 'negation of a negation' to be followed by communist 'utopia'…and thereby encourage his readers to 'participate!' in that predestined history.
And yet, this true statement is incomplete and needs the truth that while to a man, today's Democrat Party is indeed in some respects MORE radical than Karl Marx was, if we look at what Marx wrote, there is in fact no maximum radicalism inherent in Marx's theory of history. In other words, no matter how radical the Democrat Party becomes or is, it can never be at or higher than the logic of the radicalism Marx foretold.
Source: Paris Manuscripts 1844.
In these manuscripts Marx described the penultimate stage to the communist stage with the term 'raw communism', a stage that is excused with the 20th century aphorism 'you have to crack a few eggs to make an omelet'.
In this stage, all the terrible oppressive 'forces' Marx projected into free enterprise would reach their nadir, their pinnacle, they would become maximized. Marx wrote that this stage would carry this praxis-logical ordering:
"In the approach to woman as the spoil and hand-maid of communal lust is expressed the infinite degradation in which man exists for himself"
INFINITE DEGRADATION has no 'final limit' that the world allegedly must get to before the mysterious dialectic that Marx always fell back on as ultimate source code…would transform the world into a post capitalist and post state communist utopia where everyone is free to do what they want because scarcity is gone. Infinite degradation logically includes…whatever amount of degradation can be conceived, and implemented, while it may be presented with a hollow 'we're getting closer, don't worry we'll let you out of the worker camp soon, just accept this latest change of us chemically and surgically mutilating your children', the inner logic of Marxism has no finite level of degradation.
Marx was already past enslaving women into prostitution for 'the community' as one example of how degraded 'raw communism' would get. He didn't get to mutilating children, true. But his logic 'WELCOMES' it, also true.
"The first positive annulment of private property – crude communism – is thus merely a manifestation of the vileness of private property, which wants to set itself up as the positive community system."
Clarification: Marx used the term "Crude communism", other socialist writers who read Marx also used 'raw communism', synonymous.
Q+: "Perhaps coincidence, or perhaps not, but BOXING died when they got rid of “The Championship Rounds,” 13, 14, and 15. In the meantime, we have more important things to think about!"
Spoopy.
Maybe it's a signal that the reason TPTB got rid of 'championahip rounds' 13, 14, 15 was 'need for symbolism' related, that it had to be 12 because 12 means something in certain 'secret societies' perhaps.
"In other words, the same party leaders who loudly demand “voting rights” for minors and illegal immigrants during the general election, are deliberately disenfranchising their own voters in the primaries."
The same source being so loud and accusatory against their 'opponents' on voting rights, are doing the very thing they accuse 'opponents' of doing, they're consistently disenfranchising voters!
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/trump-is-right-democrats-really-are-marxist-lunatics/
I think you mistook this anon for one who cares what one word name you have repeating in your head all the time.
I mean, cigarettes? Why do you call anon a cigarette?
Thanks for confirming they're good.
>https://twitter.com/1776Diva/status/1713662189490348327
Wow that is the best so far.
I know it's hard, but he has to stop laughing while doing it, speak like that for like a good 30 seconds in a row without breaking character.
Maybe because you have a narrative to tell and you need to pretend to take ownership of words and definitions as a means to smear and slander.
Just guessing.
Yes, yours.
This is what happens when 🤡CLOWNS🤡 write media scripts.
"Does the disfunction that we've seen in Congress increase the danger in the world?"
Q+ was right. The 'questions' asked to Potato already had the answers in them!
ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111244906174355068
The puppet masters are laughing their asses off behind closed doors when this happens.
What an embarrassment.
No human being is perfectly clean.
>Safety zones
The police should build safety zones preventing adult drag queens from poisoning the minds of children.
You're conflating earth with the human mind.
Would Hillary or Obama or any of the Satan worshiping SOBs EVER publicly blame Satanists for anything?
Bibi saying this is proof to anon that Bibi is not a Satanist.
Biblical habbenings.
The satanists have nowhere to hide anymore.
Trump, Putin, Bibi all calling them out.
That's huge.
Q repeatedly wrote the blame is on the satanic cult.
Q+ confirmed: "Is that a bad thing?"
Maybe Bibi operating in Israel is like Trump as POTUS 2016-2020, leader of a country and facing threats from other countries, all orchestrated by "satanist people"
HRC is always projecting. Obama is always projecting.
Why doesn't HRC or Obama ever blame satanist people for anything?
Wouldn't your theory, if true, be a theory of a world with them doing so?
Or, do neither HRC nor Obama ever say anything bad about satanists…for fear of self-incrimination? For fear of putting that red pill into the public narrative AT ALL, which would only result in MORE attention to it and therefore them?
The fact Bibi is calling out the satanists, for the radical anti-Bibi story you'd have to believe he's willing to put more attention on himself and risk his life and risk his 'secret' life.
Or, Occam's Razor, the easiest explanation is that Bibi is not 'with' the satanists.
Both George Soros and Yival Harari have been highly critical of Israel under Bibi. Not a coincidence.
These psychos would rather Israeli people get killed if it means they can remain in ideological narrative power.
Giving a softball interview to Biden WHO FUNDED IRAN $ BILLIONS, and then blaming 'MAGA Republicans' for the mess THEY caused.
You want to talk about radical projection, that's it right there. They start wars, they bring about the killings of Israelis, then they accuse their 'MAGA' opponents of antisemitism and fascism and nazism.
Q brilliantly prepared the stage for anons to SEE THIS WHEN IT HAPPENS.
anon rejects your definition of the term 'zionist'
To prepare the world to see fascists like AG Garland.
What if 'they' recruit impressionable Jewish youth to do this, for the expressed purpose of making it seem like 'external' antisemitism doesn't exist?