I told you, Q is a tease.
>>1928453
But yes; adding him, at least, to the list would be yet another confirmation.
Gowdy = prosecutor.
Hit windows key, and type "snipping". Doesn't get any easier, really.
They were detained, not arrested. The dates are indictments.
He said it here:
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147434025
Anon Put in the Huber part, and Q confirmed it here:
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1769049.html#1769874
I'm not sure what's hard to understand here, but:
This anon is going to have their head explode when a report balls up to the press conference on Monday, and asks the question:
Who Is Q?
When Sara Sanders responds with:
"You're going to have POTUS that question", and give a total non-confirmation/non-denial, then shit is going to hit the fucking fan.
>Do they know?
Yes. There's also a TON of resignations and politicians "retiring" for reasons other than age. Those sealed indictments are going to be one of the biggest parts of the show.
Shall be awesome.
Nobody wants to actually -see- it. Anons do, however, want proof. With proof comes pain.