>>19749389

President Trump hope this message finds you:

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution all but forbids state or federal courts from imposing gag orders on the press. E.g., United States v. Quattrone, 402 F. 3d 304, 309–10 (2d Cir.

unconstitutional, unenforceable

gavel

Photo by: Photo by rawpixel.com from Pexels

Photo by rawpixel.com from Pexels

By: Kelly BroderickPosted at 8:02 PM, Jul 11, 2019 and last updated 8:02 PM, Jul 11, 2019

BALTIMORE — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has ruled that Baltimore City's practice of requiring non-disclosure agreements or "gag orders" on people settling police misconduct cases against BPD violates the First Amendment.

The ruling holds that gag orders equate to hush money to keep victims quiet, making them unconstitutional.

It is up to a defendant to waive his rights to the 1st, 5th, and 6th amendment not the courts rights to take them away or abridge them.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech

>>19749389

A gag order also violates the 4th amendment

Fourth Amendment

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Simpified

The right of the people to be secure in their persons and effects (speech), against unreasonable seizures (gag orders), shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue(gag orders), but upon probable cause (that a law was broken), supported by Oath or affirmation (testimony), and particularly describing the things to be seized (speech).

>>19749731

That video was taken down in Q3510 any other links?

>>19749569

> I can’t have a JURY

>America cannot let this happen

6th amendment

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

>>19749829

>I'm not aware that any of these rulings have been appealed.

>>19749852

>do not think any of them have been appealed yet,

Actually Eric Trump said they got their business certificates back from being revoked by stating their workers were denied due process because their accusers were never named which is the 6th Amendment. I was also right about No standing is just the lawyers not claiming damages and Dr Jan Halper said the same thing just used the word injuries (which is a sub type of class Damages).