TEstes
The Apple didn't exist until the Uighurs cultivated it from the wild in China in the 7th Century.
Pureblooded Racism
Made in China
The 'Hu Line' separates the country's wild and empty west from the vastly more populous east. In 1935, demographer Hu Huanyong drew a line across a map of China. The 'Hu Line' illustrated a remarkable divide in China's population distribution.
The Hu Line is arguably the most consequential feature of China’s geography, with demographic, economic, cultural, and political implications for the country’s past, present, and future. Yet you won’t find it on any official map of China, nor on the actual terrain of the People’s Republic itself.
The area to the west of the line comprised 64 percent of China’s territory but contained only 4 percent of the country’s population.
Inversely, 96 percent of the Chinese lived east of the ‘geo-demographic demarcation line’, as Hu called it, on just 36 percent of the land.
An additional factor typifies China’s population divide: while the country overall is ethnically very homogenous – 92 percent are Han Chinese – most of the 8 percent that make up China’s ethnic minorities live west of the line. This is notably the case in Tibet and Xinjiang, two nominally autonomous regions with non-Han ethnic majorities.
https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/hu-line/
The Titles of Nobility Amendment is a proposed and still-pending amendment to the United States Constitution. The 11th Congress passed it on May 1, 1810, and submitted to the state legislatures for ratification. It would strip United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power".
Since lawyers and judges accept the titles "Esquire"/"The Honorable", it is argued, they are not citizens and the entire judicial system is illegal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titles_of_Nobility_Amendment
Nationalism is Racism
The Government of a Constitutional Republic serves its populace, blind to Nationality.
"Creed" = Nationality
Race, religion, color, or creed…
Nondiscrimination On The Basis Of Race, Color, National Origin, Sex, Religion, Or Age In Law Enforcement Programs, Services, And Activities Receiving Assistance From The United States Department Of Justice
-
What is Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Title VI is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin by recipients of Federal financial assistance. Police departments, sheriffs' departments, and other law enforcement agencies receiving assistance from the Department of Justice (DOJ) are subject to the civil rights requirements of this and other civil rights laws.
Simply stated, all persons must be treated equally without regard to their race, color, or national origin. People may not be excluded from participating in, denied the benefits of, or discriminated against in the programs, services, or activities of an agency receiving DOJ assistance. In addition, a law enforcement agency must make sure that its policies and practices do not have the effect of discriminating against people because of their race, color, or national origin.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/nondiscrimination-basis-race-color-national-origin-sex-religion-or-age-law-enforcement-programs
To enjoy something incorrectly, according to "The Powers and Principalities"
The Princelings (Chinese: 太子党), also translated as the Party's Crown Princes, are the descendants of prominent and influential senior communist officials in the People's Republic of China. It is an informal, and often derogatory, categorization to signify those benefiting from nepotism and cronyism, by analogy with crown princes in hereditary monarchies. Many of its members hold high-level political and business positions in the upper echelons of power.
In contemporary China, "Princelings" are the descendants of senior Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leaders and have themselves risen to high-ranking positions within the CCP. If their parents belong to the first generation of CCP revolutionaries, they are also referred to as the "second Red Generation," "Red Heirs," or"the Red Nobility."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princelings
To enjoy something incorrectly, according to "The Powers and Principalities"
The Princelings (Chinese: 太子党), also translated as the Party's Crown Princes, are the descendants of prominent and influential senior communist officials in the People's Republic of China. It is an informal, and often derogatory, categorization to signify those benefiting from nepotism and cronyism, by analogy with crown princes in hereditary monarchies. Many of its members hold high-level political and business positions in the upper echelons of power.
In contemporary China, "Princelings" are the descendants of senior Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leaders and have themselves risen to high-ranking positions within the CCP. If their parents belong to the first generation of CCP revolutionaries, they are also referred to as the "second Red Generation," "Red Heirs," or"the Red Nobility."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princelings
Historically, how to control local officials who possessed imperial lineage was always a problem. The Politburo is equivalent to the inner circle of the imperial household. Its members, if assigned a local administrative position, can easily overrule any opposition in their jurisdictions as no other party officials can match them in rank and prestige.
Corb Lund - Dig Gravedigger Dig (Official Video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79llXVDWbCQ
Everlast - Smoking and Drinking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYGGfK4bqVs
"Clearly Established"
Turner v. Driver, No. 16-10312, is a 2017 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that affirmed the First Amendment right to record the police. One of the officers involved was criminally indicted for a similar incident around the same time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_v._Driver
>“No, it’s you,” Kimmel corrected. “We’re still able to say pretty much anything we want.”
Must be nice to be pals with The Qing.
Under what is known as the compelled speech doctrine, the First Amendment's free speech protections extend beyond generally keeping the government from suppressing people from saying what they want: It also generally bars the government from compelling people to express things they do not want to say.
One question that has arisen is whether the government may compel a person to publicly declare or affirm a personal belief. In Minersville School District v. Gobitis,4 the Court had upheld the power of Pennsylvania to expel from its schools certain children —Jehovah’s Witnesses—who refused upon religious grounds to join in a flag salute ceremony and recite the pledge of allegiance. “Conscientious scruples have not, in the course of the long struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a general law not aimed at the promotion or restriction of religious beliefs.” 5 But three years later, in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette,6 a six-to-three majority of the Court overturned Gobitis.7 Justice Jackson, writing for the Court, chose to ignore the religious argument and to ground the decision upon freedom of speech. The state policy, he said, constituted “a compulsion of students to declare a belief. . . . It requires the individual to communicate by word and sign his acceptance of the political ideas [the flag] bespeaks.” 8 The power of a state to follow a policy that “requires affirmation of a belief and an attitude of mind,” however, is limited by the First Amendment, which, under the standard then prevailing, required the state to prove that for the students to remain passive during the ritual “creates a clear and present danger that would justify an effort even to muffle expression.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/compelled-speech-overview
That tracks, logically.
Anon was considering Namefagging as "Nigger O'Goldsteinberg" to assert Jewish privilege from having content deleted.
>When you guys going to disclose that your just stringing everyone along until the 2024 election? When you guys going to disclose that elections have always been fake and gay? Never? Yeah, never.
An artform?
Discuss.
Voting is an intelligence test
Your vote doesn't matter
But you go line up like good little comrades
And play the part
Filtering is a wonderful evolutionary adaptation.
For example, The Swai fish filters through a shit pond for nourishment to turn itself into cheap white fillets available at your local Wal-Mart.
Right! Tilapia eat farm raised trout sewage as it flows into the next pool downstream.