>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned arguments, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned arguments, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
If you look at the 20 Republicans that just voted against @Jim_Jordan for Speaker, they all fall into one of three categories:
Appropriators
There's an old saying in Congress that there are three parties:
Democrats,
Republicans, and
appropriators.
These people make up the bureaucratic industrial complexes and want to be able to continue deficit spending like there's no tomorrow. Of the 20 Jordan No's, seven were members of the House Appropriations Committee: Kay Granger, Mike Simpson, Mario Diaz-Balart, Steve Womack, John Rutherford, Tony Gonzales, and Jake Ellzey.
Defense Hawks: It's a pretty simple category here. These are the people who are scared Speaker Jordan would stop them from being able to give an endless amount of money to Ukraine and other pointless wars in random parts of the globe. Jim Jordan hinted as much that the gravy train to Ukraine would be slowed so now they're denying him the Speakership. Four of the 20 Jordan No's are members of the Armed Services Committee: Don Bacon, Carlos Gimenez, Jen Kiggans, and Nick LaLota.
Members in Biden-won Districts: This category probably seems to make more sense to you. They represent blue districts therefore they don't want to vote for a conservative like Jim Jordan. But here's the thing: Several members like Brian Fitzpatrick, David Valadao, and others who also represent blue districts but just voted for him. Do you also really think the average voter in their district even cares who the Speaker is?
What the holdouts have in common is that they're all freshmen members of Congress who desperately need K-Street money in order to be re-elected next year: Anthony D'Esposito, Andrew Garbarino, Nick LaLota, and Mike Lawler.
On top of that, all but two of the 20 Jordan No's submitted earmarks requests for the latest budget.
Basically, Jim Jordan is being opposed by members who are a part of the military and bureaucratic industrial complexes, as well as members who need lobbyist dollars to be re-elected.
https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1714369022651781246
https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1714369022651781246
https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1714369022651781246