>>19756932 LB

Suppose anything is possible, but I do seem to have missed the memo that HRC is anon. Unless you’re referring to the concept that Q is a pacification for op and that HRC, Obama, etc are anon in that aspect. Could buy it, though still hoping against hope that some good eventually comes from all of this.

>>19757142 LB

>Going spiritual might be garbage

What do you mean by this? Could you explain a bit further? Interesting post.

>>19757863

Terrorism is funded anyway it can be, I would think. But, she’s prolly referring to the average joe crypto owner whose money they can’t so readily control as the terrorist here, isn’t she?