>>1976238 (lb)
>re: what list is Gowdy on, anyway?
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a 'White Hat Gowdy' as a judge, if he is, in fact, clean.
But the optics for people not seeking re-election is not a good look.
>>1976238 (lb)
>re: what list is Gowdy on, anyway?
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a 'White Hat Gowdy' as a judge, if he is, in fact, clean.
But the optics for people not seeking re-election is not a good look.
Make her watch the Matrix, then tell her the metaphor is only thinly veiled. Monsters are real. So are vampires and demons.
When she stops looking at you like you just grew another head, show her the evidence.
It has to be this way. Blame the shills.
It's bad enough that BO can't disable the site's filtering mechanism. Having a trigger-happy BV just makes it worse.
>directorblue
Are you seriously that fucking stupid? You literally could not think of a less red-flag name?
Am I asking rhetorical questions here?
????
>Have you ever encountered a demon?
There are many in the entertainment world, don't be naive.
>A person who is a mind control slave of an Illuminati bloodline member
>And does the bidding of that member
>Is not a demon
No, they are not a demon at all. They are infested by one though. (or several, it's been known to happen)
>Demons are real
>But fallen from God's grace
False. They never had God's grace to begin with.
>BO do you actually not realize that they are playing you?
Stop being naive.
Whether the BV in question was a shill or not is irrelevant, because ''they were not following the chain of command.''
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.