Interesting timingTODAYS DELTASof all things [MEDIA MATTERS] and Anti Flynn.
>>1062345
very well, so search for anything before OCT 2017 if you want to split hairs. The data shows that the keyword didn't start trending until Nov.
>>1062355
Distraction.
They are here in force.
Q
Yesterday, Obutma highlighted BasketBall(IIRC) team from Las Vegas
o7
Media Matters trolls - TOADS - Coordinated Disinformation Campaign. PAYTRIDIOTS
Anons. Frogs. Digital Soldiers. Patriots
Multiple Meanings Exist
How many Biolabs are in Israel? Ukraine certainly had many. War? On. Drugs.
US bio-labs overseas: Time to open the doors
The Yongsan US military base in Seoul, the ROK, was surrounded by ROK citizens shouting "Shut down the bio-labs!" It was not the first time that such protests took place in a country in which US troops are based. But the date of this campaign made it different. It was April 10, 2022, the 50th anniversary of the opening for signature of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).
From the GG-21 Program in Georgia to the JUPITR Biochemical Experimentation Program in the ROK, biochemical experimental programs controlled by Washington have been exposed one after another. But that is only the tip of the iceberg. The US, a self-proclaimed "beacon of democracy," stands out in conducting dangerous biological experiments and expanding its bio-military empire to the whole world. Recently, a total of 5,629 contracts about US overseas biological laboratories were revealed. And the documents have so much to disclose.
The discrepancy in the number of overseas bio-labs would be an interesting start to a journey of discovery . The US openly admitted that it runs 336 biological laboratories in 30 countries around the world, including 26 in Ukraine. However, the contracts suggest that the US has signed contracts with 49 countries, way more than it had admitted. According to Igor Kirillov, Chief of Russia's radiation, chemical and biological protection force, the US has formed a network of more than 30 biological laboratories in Ukraine, which is also more than the US version of the tally.
In one instance of contract with Ukraine, there is a paragraph that goes, "preventing the proliferation of technology, pathogens and expertise that are located at facilities in Ukraine and that could be used in the development of biological weapons." The wording sounds neutral indeed. But considering the shadowy lab operations and curious coincidences, this admonishment is more like an admission of a standard laboratory practice. It is particularly so when the media outlets all over the world have covered crises in places where US bio-labs are located. The Time of Israel reported that the secret human body experiments in Georgia's Lugar Research Center had caused a number of deaths. In BBC's report, the US troops in the ROK conducted tests on a variety of highly toxic substances, including live anthrax, without informing the ROK government and local citizens. Reuters reported that, on the day the Russian-Ukrainian conflict broke out, the US-controlled biological laboratory in Ukraine urgently destroyed deadly pathogens, including anthrax and rat plague.
If what the US funds and runs in Ukraine and elsewhere are truly "biological research facilities," as US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland claimed during a Senate hearing, why would the names of US arms dealers appear on the contracts ordered by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency? The leopard cannot change its spots, people say, neither can Lockheed Martin, Raytheon Technologies, General Dynamics and Metabiota.
Within international fora, the US is afraid of bringing the Pentagon-controlled biological laboratories to light. For a long time, it stands alone in opposing the establishment of a verification mechanism for the BWC. Despite international public pressure, the US has never released the specifics of its experiments in biological labs around the world but brushed them off as "defensive."
As Turkish medical biology genetics expert Korkut Ulucan says, "the US should make actually biological laboratories public and set up ethics committees, with oversight by an independent body composed of multiple parties. If research conducted in secret gets out of hand, the results could be catastrophic."
When commitments do not square with facts, fatal accidents keep occurring, and blood-thirsty military-industrial complexes are involved in ought-to-be biological research. Only candor, transparency and supervision can help dissipate the public suspicion, address international concern and prevent catastrophic results.
The US can no longer pretend that the world cannot see or does not care. The international community, the countries where US overseas bio-labs are based in particular, is keen to get an explanation.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202204/1260665.shtml?id=11
Das a man
DOGS
Tropical disease now endemic in U.S., CDC says. In deadlier form, it's coming via dogs.
A tropical disease once seen almost exclusively among Americans returning from travel abroad now has a unique U.S. strain.
Health officials warn that a related, deadlier parasite seen in other countries could thrive in the U.S. due to these improved climatological conditions for the disease.
The parasite known as leishmania spreads when sandflies, historically found in tropical climes, bite people. Sandflies carrying the parasite also infect other mammals such as woodrats which further allow its movement. Climate change, some researchers say, may be expanding the geographical reach of sandflies and, consequently, the reach of the disease.
A related parasite also comes in undetected by way of one million dogs entering the country annually. The U.S. doesn't have adequate screening in place for the parasite, which is something researchers hope to address.
Previous infections came to the U.S. when people traveling from warmer areas brought the disease back. The U.S. doesn’t have federal reporting on the disease, making it difficult to understand its sudden prevalence in recent years. But new findings from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate cases of the milder form of the disease, cutaneous leishmaniasis, derived from a slightly different American parasitic strain.
“This is a disease that we in the United States don’t really think about,” said Dr. Mary Kamb, a medical epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. “It’s really a disease that belongs to other countries.”
The World Health Organization estimates as many as one million people get cutaneous leishmaniasis annually. The populations infected are mostly in areas with warmer climates such as the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Latin America. However, health officials suspect warmer southern American states, including Texas, have more suitable conditions for sandflies to thrive and pass on the disease.
The disease can disfigure people’s skin with ulcers that sometimes take weeks or months to show after a person has been bitten. It can leave scarring that researchers say is recognizable and brings a social stigma in low-income countries. Cutaneous leishmaniasis doesn’t cause death or severe disability, they said.
On Thursday, Kamb and other CDC researchers presented an analysis at the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene’s annual conference in Chicago looking at cases sent to CDC laboratories for testing from 2005 to 2019. The CDC findings are based on more than 2,000 cases across the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Eighty-six of the people involved in the research had not traveled abroad prior to developing leishmaniasis.
While cases found in the U.S. typically have genetic strains from abroad, the CDC researchers’ analysis indicates that a parasitic strain circulating in the U.S. for years is slightly different from the parasitic strain of leishmania mexicana that’s typically found in Mexico and Central America.
The findings suggest the local strain has circulated for some time, and study authors recommend the U.S. develop better screening of the disease, Kamb said.
moar
https://www.yahoo.com/news/tropical-disease-now-endemic-u-173927200.html
212, 212, 212
LOUD MOUTHED [D] troll
The first Battle of Herdonia was fought in 212 BC during the Second Punic War between Hannibal's Carthaginian army and Roman forces led by Praetor Gnaeus Fulvius Flaccus, brother of the consul. The Roman army was destroyed, leaving Apulia free of Romans for the year.
>to an anon asking a question
There were TWO Questions asked
One, used to shill slide
The other IGNORED completely.
?Q tagged a post that had the only question anons wanted to REALLY see the answer to.
>Peddle that semantic bs elsewhere.
Not true.
A Shill askedTWOQuestions, of which that same SHILL SLID the ASSUMED answer.
Why?
Why are you pretending that the OTHER Question about WHEN DO WE SEE PAIN wasn't ALSO ASKED???
When Do we start seeing the Pain…
As in YOUR PAIN WILL BE COMING SOON!
>Give it a rest
NO.
I'm sick of seeing that SLIDE
You're ignoring the fact that there were TWO Questions asked in that post, but only taking the Tagging to mean ONE THNG? Like you know what Q was pointing out?
The P bullshit or the PAIN?
Why isn't P FOR PAIN???
That slide has been used now for years and it's old! No one ever points out the other question.