>Massive information and 100% evidence will be made available during the Corrupt Trials started by our Political Opponent
Well, that's gonna trigger some hits in the drops.
Maybe of the how do you legally introduce evidence variety.
>meme triggered flashbacks
I had frens in high school that worked at White Castle.
They used to crack up all the time until it became a several times a night thing.
People at the drive thru saying:
I'll have 10 Double-Cheese, 2 Fries, 2 Onion Rings, and…
A small Coke.
Flynn?
To a certain extent, but not anywhere close to #1, and mostly after the ball was already rolling.
It spread everywhere outside of /pol/ in bits and pieces here and there.
Then when on 8ch/QR and the Q/Q+ proofs started getting to the mathematically impossible to deny phase it spread like wildfire.
Gotcha.
The wildest part for me as hindsight is 20/20 keeps maturing is the Q Namedrop KOD.
It seems like everyone he mentioned by name in the drops in a positive light hasn't been so positive in their perceived actions.
Of course, that could just be them playing their part in The Plan.
But, to outsiders/doubters/shills, it makes for easy Ha Ha QTards! fodder when they appear to fuck over the cause here.
kek they've gotten periodic anon feedback about it since around '19 or so
By my calculations the end of 2025* is the deadline for some major BOOM action.
From a there aren't any hopium drops left that cover the time after that date perspective.
(* anal spergs wishing to be technical about it may use Jul 09, 2025 as the date)
Right.
And the thing that VS rails against the most is P.
Like that's his #1 mission and everything else is just filler.
Now, what else did Q mention about P?
Well, it wasn't a mention - moar like an ambiguous no comment tagging of an anons's question.
The infamous 1970 drop.
That would be nice, but it would take the act of a hacker to pull that off.
From an optics standpoint that would be career suicide.
He's sitting pretty right now they haven't been able to kill him off with the public tho they've tried real hard.
If he suddenly does a hurr durr Q! they'll bury him successfully with the GP.
Q1970 is the most direct Q has been regarding P=?.
It's just as strong as anything else in evidence about the matter.
The bottom line is that in typical Q fashion there are few if any absolutes when it comes to topics like this one.
That's obviously much different than the Q scenario OP mentioned.
Your possibility falls under The Plan Script vs DS Kabuki Theater which is the main theme of the whole you're watching a movie.
>>19769794
I'm a sucker for Mozza parallels.
>Where did the people that ruined CBTS go?
Yeah, dasting ? -dunno what they're doing now - do you?
I do know @RealFungus~ stopped by for a couple breads in the middle of Summer.
>Spam your
VS is the one that spams about it and conveniently omits Q1970 from the evidence he constantly posts non-stop annoying tf outta most anons.
I'm just an anon that chases and presents fact based evidence in an objective way on a wide range of topics whenever I'm able to do so.
With my fair share of shitposting as well.
And I don't ever spam nor flood Muh Catalog with bs.
>your payseur nonsense
So, mentioning Q1970 at all in response to others bringing up P is pushing Payseur nonsense?
Dasting.
I'll let my clearly objective posts above be the evidence that I'm not pushing jack shit.
Q1970 is just another drop in the P saga.
Simple as.
I merely bring it up when it's ignored as such.
Then comes the Hurr Durr Payseur Spam posse blowing it out of proportion every single time to anyone that does what I just did.
The most shilly thing of all is that.
Totally objective.
Many such anons have directly asked Q questions.
99.9% of them do not get Q'd with a reply.
That one was one of the very small % that did.
And I clearly mentioned Q merely tagged it without comment.
That's it, no insistence that it proves P=Payseur.
He was much moar direct.
He gave one of his few Q replies to an anon asking a question to the one in Q1970.
That's pretty fucking direct.
The fact that he didn't write anything is what makes it a legit open-ended situation that is argued about to this day.
The shilly part is that some don't want anons to talk about it and claim the P question has been solved.
It hasn't.
Q tagged a post that had the only question anons wanted to REALLY see the answer to.
Peddle that semantic bs elsewhere.
Give it a rest.
That anon asked a direct question about P that anons had been digging/arguing/asking him further about over for quite some time by that point.
Then Q replies to it - woo-hoo!
With no comment - WTF?
>t. That's Q for ya tho
>>19770219
> prevent any true digging into P that suggests anything but PAYSUER
Bullshit.
The only non-stop shill-like behavior is from people whinging about Payseur.
Nobody is stopping any diggs.
>FOR THE RECORD
My stance is that nobody has proven beyond a reasonable doubt who P is nor has Q confirmed who it is.
Yet.
I already explained the direct part above.
If you think it's shilly to point out that someone's P question post got Q'd and that it means something not absolutely nothing then keep doing you no issues from me about it.