re: >>1914368 BO: Vote for poll on baker TC's (https://www.strawpoll.me/15973538)
Due to recent events in last bread, I have voted NO on this proposal.
I also do not like the shady nature in which the failed bakers union idea is being repackaged and positioned for a reprise.
> let's play place-the-blame and pass the buck.
Irrelevant. Another fame outlet will not solve the problem.
Anons saving real notables out-of-band does work, though. And it's what we've been doing since December ;p
(192.168.x.x and 127.0.0.1 are private address spaces, not publicly assigned addresses)
Just saying…
>proves my point (>>1977281) about the out-of-band saving style vs another fame free for all
Thank you for the notables, patriot!
>The only reservation I have about it, is that BO picks who he gives TC's to
Same, but not because of BO. BO is legit. The responsibility becomes the wedge of clowns. I, personally, would not want that added responsibility if I were BO.
>It seems like there could be division amongst us if one baker gets annointed while another does not.
Fame whoring does that.
>I have been in the middle of shill baker situations several times and I hate it
I had to take over a bake from a shill baker in the wee hours when I still baked.. It sucks. That's why archiving everything matters, even if you do not bake.