>>19770235 (pb)
>why does it bother you that he believes that it should be that if someone say, worked for foreign intelligence, or has dual loyaltees that they ought to be excluded from being in legislators?
>why does this issue upset you so much that every time anyone discusses it you badger them?
I never knew asking an anon to clarify their statements to confirm the truthfulness was "badgering".
>who do you work for?
It's not "who", it's "what" i work for. The "what" would be honest discussions and elimination of the whirlwinds of BS that blow through, making everyone dumber.
>who pays you to shill for those with loyalties to foreign and possibly hostile nations?
No one pays me for anything, bub. I've got a pretty nice situation.
I care bc the accusations of dual citizenship are made and never substantiated no matter how politely and concisely one asks for evidence. Instead, the accuser and it's cronies come up with various diversions from the actual thing, belittling anyone who notices this is what's happening. At the end of the day, I don't care at ALL abt the subject of dual citizenship and elected officials. There are no prohibitions against it and that's a very small thing to worry about.
The problem, ultimately, is dishonesty. It's pathetic and shits on every anon on this board who isn't a literal clown, retard, or dipshit. Granted, that may only be a handful of actual humans, at this point. Who fucking knows?