Anonymous ID: 7c4ca1 Oct. 20, 2023, 9:18 a.m. No.19770395   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0415

>>19770362

>Granted, that may only be a handful of actual humans, at this point.

kek yeah

The most obvious shills on here are the ones that ass blast anyone with a dissenting view that runs counter to their narrative.

Calling someone out for 1+1=3 is one thing, but modern day QR attacks opinions and even some facts.

Oh well, it' all mostly time wasting until the Booms hit at some point.

Anonymous ID: 7c4ca1 Oct. 20, 2023, 9:21 a.m. No.19770407   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0445 >>0476 >>0655

>>19770398

>so do you think it's OK that if someone works for a foreign intelligence agency that it's OK for them to be a legislature in the US?

I certainly don't.

But, it is factual that nobody in Congress has to prove/disprove the existence of additonal passports/citizenship.

I don't approve of anyone attacking those of us that wish that weren't so.

But, it's also wrong to say that the number of dual citizens currently in Congress is a known figure.

Anonymous ID: 7c4ca1 Oct. 20, 2023, 9:33 a.m. No.19770490   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19770445

I'm not the OP and I also post about a wide range of things.

This same discussion was had yesterday and I think there's confusion on both sides of the issue.

>It boils to

  1. I think Govt Officials (Elected/Unelected) should have to do moar extensive disclosure ala what Q mentioned a few times in the drops.

Many anons feel this way (I've seen't it).

  1. Anyone here pushing caps that state the exact amount of dual-citizen Congresscritters is full of shit because nobody knows nor can get a straight answer about it as no law is in place for them to do so.

This is the main point of contention imo right now.