>>19771800 pb
>Q acknowledged the question but did not reply.
This has happened MANY times with anons assuming an acknowledgement of their posts is a total agreement with all of their comments, many of them compound questions or assertions.
An example, in the London pics, (yes UK Bread anon here) is an anon showing a picture of the Jubilee Bridge steps and security cam at the top. Anons assumed all of the Victoria Embankment pics were taken from a ‘traffic cam’ when a close analysis of their fields of view shows the ‘NSA Traffic cam’ had legs and that some of the pics were taken whilst descending those stairs, one of them being taken at street level looking over the roof of a passing car. (Picrel of Embankment pics FOV study)
Another London pics acknowledged post is the one where an anon says basically, yeah we know the timeframe is from 2015/2016. Q acknowledged the post making anons assume the London pics are from that time when analysis proves they are ALL from Christmas 2013 and could not possibly be related to Crossfire Hurricane.
Lots of false supposition has occurred from such tacit Q acknowledgements.