Anonymous ID: bc3211 Oct. 21, 2023, 3:17 p.m. No.19777849   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7868 >>7908 >>7940 >>7977 >>7999 >>8140

@stkirsch: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market

 

https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1715820838564593745

https://archive.ph/gR0fc

 

Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It's considered adulteration. I just got off the phone with Professor Byram Bridle and Dr. Robert Malone on this.

 

https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1715827705550372978

https://archive.ph/9gD5Z

 

Michigan remdesivir case is very important precedent here proving liability shield falls when there is undisclosed contamination of active ingredients.

 

https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1715830007019487554

https://archive.ph/0CCV5

 

The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination, and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable. But we have the Pfizer documents that were given to the FDA so we know what the FDA got. And I seriously doubt there’s any disclosure of SV40 contamination. That means we have an adulterated vaccine and the FDA has to remove it from the market until the adulteration is fixed. If the FDA doesn’t do that, they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law.