>>1978596
FYI, that code will only last 24 hours... :) (Yes that's a hint as to the nature of it)
I'm not sure that's an official account.
No blue checkmark
And far too many Q-ish references… it doesn't match up with how cagey Q has been.
That's exactly the problem… what if "POTUS_Schedule" is run by an Anon on this board?
What if they saw that Q drop, and fabricated that quote to correspond to the Q drop?
The ONLY missing link is verification of who runs the twitter account actually being in the WH.
Is there another place, like maybe on the public White House site, where they post the POTUS schedule where a NORMIE or Anon could harvest that information for tweeting? If so, then the proof is busted.
What if Q is a LARP
AND… runs the POTUS_Schedule twitter?
Still no verification of a direct connection to the WH or POTUS.
I'll keep blowing holes in this theory if you want… It's not that I don't want Q to be legit and real… but we have to have ROCK SOLID proofs, not this wishful thinking "confirmation bias" shit.
Who is David?
FYI: You know when I know I've won the argument?
When my opponent starts slinging insults and calling names.
G'night.
Did you give up? did you forget about me? :)
Wow, your life seems to have so much Discord in it.
If you understand, why aren't you here yet? :)