>>1978588

Starting to get a little obvious with these official accounts, aren't they? Pretty fucking amazing, if you ask me.

>>1978641

Here's the thing:

1. No blue checkmark: Got it; plausible deniability.

2. Never missing scheduled events: Roger that.

3. Seems to be in sync with the official schedule.

4. Quotes at the end started recently as per Q drops getting more brazen with claims of "proof".

I really, honestly, think this Twitter is ran by someone in the WH staff.

>>1978718

Oh, we can do this shit all day, anon. Did you see our lovely redheads got featured in the #WhoIsQ trend?

https://twitter.com/B754344255/status/1012801471371456524

Hell to-the yes!

>>1978683

My money is on John Gizzi. Dude's been around a while, and has the stones to do it. Not only that, that trick he does with his glasses is insane!

>>1978775

Easy fix for that, anon.

>>1978781

>Plausible deniability

Again, if the Q question gets dropped, I BET YOU MONEY that the Q drops on the qresearch breads will start to predate the drops on the "public" accounts. Perhaps even DJT's twitter.

That would be INSANE.

>>1978836

You, read:

>>1978848

If/When it happens, the entire world is going to be turned upside down on its collective head. Oh man; it's just around the corner. I wonder how many more anons we're going to gain after that happens?

I really REALLY hope this place has the server load capable of supporting it! This entire thing just bleeds DJT's mindset. Think about it. Drama, action, nuking the cabal and carrying anons on a journey to discover the truth. It's exactly how I envision him to do it.

It just FITS.

>>1978804

>>1978830

I'm telling you anons. John is /ourguy/. He's an actual journalist. He's not always been spot on with his predictions, but I think he's got the insight to see this as being something worth digging in to, and pursuing its veracity.

Hat tip to Mr. Gizzi!

>>1978955

I cam here to get digits and make epic predictions. I'm out of neither.

>>1979001

This is why I'm into redheads.

>>1979031

I'm absolutely certain that an anon already asked him directly to do this. I'm also absolutely certain it's at least "on his mind". He may or may not be here right now doing some "investigative journalism".

Hope he's enjoying his weekend. Big week ahead!!!

>>1979077

Oh, man. This is the stuff I yearn for. My wife just isn't very politically motivated, and I get it. You either are into this or you aren't. She told me the other day "Why don't you go golfing more or play video games with your friends again". My response was "But hun, you got to understand. It's as if someone put the most awesome drama you like to watch on TV, and gave you a role in it as an actress. You get to hang out with all the stars you like to watch on TV, banter back and forth with them on a day-to-day basis, and help the good guys win. Could you turn that down?"

She conceded right then and there. From a red headed woman, that's a nigh impossibility on an average day.

>>1979161

>we aren't just enjoying the show.. we are in it.

>>1978701

>and that the clowns have BO's emotional…

And this is why I don't read the HuffPo. Take note, anon.

>>1978887

We gotta try to keep those Twitter resources, though. If you can get another account going, make it seem more "normie" and just tweet/retweet pro-Q stuff. Float yourself right under the radar.