>>19784952 pb Part 1 Lawsuit

Dear President Trump, hope this message finds you well. This was a previous notable in regards to this case. I will post part 2 next.

U.S. Constitution Article VI, Paragraph 2 is the supreme Law of the Land and The 6th Amendment gives defendants the right to an impartial jury.

President Trump can appeal on these grounds or better yet put in a motion to dismiss the case entirely based upon the violation of Federal law.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause states "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

The 6th Amendment of US Constitution

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

>>19785916 Part 1

Part 2 from >>19680944 pb

PDJT is not the consumer: DA sues on behalf of "insurers and banks" as consumers, in fraud case, and their past judgments is proof of it.

Team Trump:

The whole basis of NYS 63-12 is to sue on behalf of "The People of NY", which is the consumer "not" PDJT. The DA is applying "The People of NY" to mean "The insurers and bankers", they are the consumers that the DA is suing on behalf of and the DA is given broad powers by the NYS to protect the consumers interest, which the judge already made a judgement stating that Trump repeatedly defrauded the "insurers and bankers", so they are trapped in their intent.

Make a motion to dismiss on this, because if you call Trump the consumer, then the appellate court will tell you that the DA has the right to protect all consumers including Mr. Trump; it won't work. If the insurers and banks are the consumers then as private enterprises they cannot be "The people of NYS" which is the entire premise of opening and trying a case.

Secondly, you can also dismiss based upon the violation of the 6th Amendment because Trump is entitled to a jury without delay. So not only did they

a: not give him a jury

b: delayed in doing so and even passed judgement with one

c: never named his accusers either

d: The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2 establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. So they cannot get away with a, b, and c because that violates the Supremacy clause and therefor you can dismiss based upon ta, b, c, and/or d.

If the courts past judgment was that Trump defrauded the "insurers and banks" then that is proof positive that the Judge and DA are using them to mean the consumer that they are suing on behalf of as "The people of NYS" which they are not.

>>19785920 b should read without one.

>>19785922

>Last day of the year is 12/31/23

>123123

Today is 10/23/2023

1023 2023