About time you made a smart Move.
>19785954
<Boomerangs and what not
>Catch this.
>You really fucked up.
The originals were not masked. Do you want the archive link now?
<Boomerangs?
Archive link to your previously exhibited (subsequently deleted) contributions, to this bread: https://archive.ph/EtgyZ#selection-14587.0-14587.6
Yes, you lost, that is correct.
Everyone who posts pictures of little children's bloody, naked genitals, like you did here today, loses.
You're a loser.
Pedophiles tend to laugh like maniacs, when put on the spot (like HRC does).
Actions speak louder than words, don't they Baker.
Baker: "It's okay to delete the entire post (instead of the offending image only) - remove all evidence of it (excluding the archived instances) - and not mention anything about the pics in the bread (no warning; nothing at all), while the Pedophile keeps posting in the bread."
True?
False?
<cant rally bake
You posted → https://archive.ph/EtgyZ#selection-14587.0-14587.6
You Sir, are a traitor to Humanity.
Users/ Employees who post naked children on here, believe that they won't be held responsible, later? They believe deleted from bread means deleted from all digital records? They will go to prison, if they don't die first.
-
Delete entire post (replacement SOP) = Explain Archives, Often.
-
Delete only image(s) in question (original SOP) = All Problems Solved.
We can all see how much compassion you have for bloody, naked children in pictures here. And we can all see how much respect you have for the global rules of this board. It's all painfully obvious, to everyone.
Everyone is confident people who post pics like that here, are completely educated in every nuance of every applicable law which they may break here. But then again, the Devil is in the detail, isn't he. It is not like the USMIL helps maintain this board.
The global rule states no naked children. Tell me one Right reason to do it?
The globals rule states no naked children. Pedos call that censorship.
Pedos also show great compassion to hear of little, naked children's private parts on full display, bloody even. Just like every User here today. The compassion for children here today is truly indescribable.
If you ignore it, no one will notice you consented to it. If you pretend you didn't notice, no one will notice you were complicit by default. If you stay silent, no one will notice you complied with it.
You are wrong. The male deer stand behind their family in order to protect them. Predators of deer do not approach them head-on. Show us how smart you really are though.
Perhaps you should leave this board and go in search of practical life skills and basic knowledge, and then try coming back with some sense.
Well, okay. If basic third-grader knowledge of the animal kingdom is what brought you here to this Q Research board, who would one be to discourage the opportunity you have to, again, show us how smart you actually are? Because most third-graders can perform internet searches for basic answers to simple questions such as yours.
>pfzier knew it was killing children
>Triple X syndrome
Not a surprise focus from the User who posted very little children's naked, bloody private parts, here on the board. No one is surprised you brought up X or XX or XXX, after posting naked children's genitals. Traitor.
The board rules state no naked children.
So why are you posting naked children's private parts? Bloody, and being touched by an adult? Tell us your good reason for breaking the rules of this board, in order to post then re-post them? You are a fool.
Baker, thank you for deleting the pics of naked children's genitals from this bread. Oh wait.. you did not delete the naked children.
You are the one with the reading comprehension deficit, as you evidenced by failure to read or comprehend the simple language of the global rules. You are a literal moron.
A literal moron who is so obsessives about the pics of naked children's genitals you posted, that you had to repost after deletion, then throw a temper tantrum to make sure you felt better about yourself for being such a marvelous example of human waste.
Did you include the naked kid pics posted by that pedo who has been whining about how naked kids are ok here? It's very notable.
You left out your favorite notable:
So you are OK with naked children's genitals in the bread? So that means you are also a pedo, is that correct? Because if you are not a pedo, and you bake by the rules, you will delete the pedo pics. Which are you, a Baker or a Pedo?
You are a blind, moron? → >>19786361
BAKER DID YOU FINALLY FIND THE NAKED KID PICS IN THIS POST?
Shhh.. it's a game and they always lose.
You mean, a PEDO posted the NAKED KID PICS
Aw, ain't you just too purdy. But if you keep describing yourself, you might accidentally Dox yourself. You also seem enraged over the fact that this anon objected to NAKED KID PICS. That says a lot for you.
You earned all 30 shekels of silver - Just ask the User whose NAKED KID PICS you protected in this bread, that User will tell you, "You Earned It."
It's okay, the previous bread state has been fully archived. The side by side comparison is looking good so far. Just keep deleting and replacing posts, and it should be finished in no time.
Sounds like something John Podesta would say.
I'll get that third, different, archive of this bread if need be. 40 Posts.
Do you enjoy protecting Pedophiles? How about joking about Pedophilia? You are doing those things, so you must sympathize with Pedos.
You are laughing about it, because to you, Pedophiles abusing children is a joke.